| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing as expected (41st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 59 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. |
| Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 63%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average. |
| Graphics | 77.9% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels. |
| Boot Drive | The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times. |
| Memory | 16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
Sub-optimal background CPU (18%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
| Motherboard | Asrock N68-GS4/USB3 FX (all builds) |
| Memory | 10.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.9 GHz |
| Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs |
| OS | Windows 10 |
| BIOS Date | 20141002 |
| Uptime | 0.2 Days |
| Run Date | Oct 28 '18 at 22:35 |
| Run Duration | 149 Seconds |
| Run User | FRA-User |
| Background CPU | 18% |
PC Performing as expected (41st percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
63%
Good
|
54% 81.3 Pts
|
34% 283 Pts
|
22% 361 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Nvidia GTX 1080-$195
CLim: 2025 MHz, MLim: 2502 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 416.34
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
77.9%
Very good
|
68% 113 fps
|
97% 119 fps
| |
| Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
21.3%
Poor
|
18% 82.8 MB/s
|
44% 11.7 MB/s
| |
|
Hitachi HUA723020ALA 2TB
971GB free (System drive)
Firmware: MK7O
SusWrite @10s intervals: 61 87 90 103 103 101 MB/s
|
54.2%
Above average
|
62% 84.9 MB/s
|
160% 1.17 MB/s
| |
|
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$32
371GB free
Firmware: 01.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 167 169 165 168 169 168 MB/s
|
87.3%
Excellent
|
95% 129 MB/s
|
223% 1.63 MB/s
| |
|
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$32
930GB free
Firmware: 01.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 164 164 160 163 165 162 MB/s
|
94.3%
Outstanding
|
98% 135 MB/s
|
232% 1.6 MB/s
| |
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
HyperX Fury DDR3 1866 C10 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB DIMM 1866 MHz
Performing below potential (16th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP |
46.7%
Average
|
48% 16.9 GB/s
|
26% 9.2 GB/s
|
58% 69.5 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical N68-GS4/USB3 FX Builds (Compare 33 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
Motherboard: Asrock N68-GS4/USB3 FX
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| FX-6300AMD $90Bench 55%, 261,607 samples | 12x |
| FX-8320EAMD $87Bench 58%, 33,199 samples | 8x |
| FX-4130 Quad-CoreAMD $150Bench 52%, 8,564 samples | 4x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| GTX 750-TiNvidia $92Bench 17%, 309,423 samples | 4x |
| GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 4x |
| GTX 960Nvidia $198Bench 33%, 440,282 samples | 4x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 48% - Average | Total price: $277 |