Asus ROG STRIX X399-E GAMING

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 92%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 80%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 138%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (30th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 70 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 74.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics122% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive101% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
5 years ago, 5 years ago.
MotherboardAsus ROG STRIX X399-E GAMING  (all builds)
Memory53.7 GB free of 64 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors, 3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20181012
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateOct 28 '18 at 20:07
Run Duration192 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU5%

 PC Performing below expectations (30th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen TR 2990WX-$790
SP3r2, 1 CPU, 32 cores, 64 threads
Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 3.35 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (23rd percentile)
74.7% Very good
Memory 75.2
1-Core 104
2-Core 214
73% 131 Pts
4-Core 422
8-Core 466
58% 444 Pts
64-Core 3,972
246% 3,972 Pts
Poor: 68%
This bench: 74.7%
Great: 89%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-Ti-$499
Zotac(19DA 2471) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1999 MHz, MLim: 2752 MHz, Ram: 11GB, Driver: 416.34
Performing below potential (43rd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
122% Outstanding
Lighting 167
Reflection 121
Parallax 164
136% 150 fps
MRender 119
Gravity 169
Splatting 124
112% 137 fps
Poor: 109%
This bench: 122%
Great: 133%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Pro 256GB-$90
133GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RVM01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 408 395 425 458 461 469 MB/s
Performing below expectations (30th percentile)
101% Outstanding
Read 464
Write 474
Mixed 408
SusWrite 436
100% 445 MB/s
4K Read 36.9
4K Write 71.6
4K Mixed 46.1
153% 51.5 MB/s
DQ Read 213
DQ Write 164
DQ Mixed 258
174% 212 MB/s
Poor: 78%
This bench: 101%
Great: 131%
Samsung 845DC EVO 480GB
388GB free
Firmware: EXT03X3Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 363 384 391 419 420 421 MB/s
Performing as expected (56th percentile)
90.5% Outstanding
Read 443
Write 381
Mixed 275
SusWrite 400
84% 375 MB/s
4K Read 28.1
4K Write 66.7
4K Mixed 35.5
123% 43.4 MB/s
DQ Read 234
DQ Write 223
DQ Mixed 210
162% 222 MB/s
Poor: 65%
This bench: 90.5%
Great: 107%
Samsung 840 250GB-$251
93GB free
Firmware: DXT0AB0Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 240 241 240 243 243 244 MB/s
Performing as expected (41st percentile)
66.1% Good
Read 417
Write 246
Mixed 147
SusWrite 242
58% 263 MB/s
4K Read 23.3
4K Write 48.1
4K Mixed 20
86% 30.5 MB/s
DQ Read 179
DQ Write 211
DQ Mixed 56.6
81% 149 MB/s
Poor: 51%
This bench: 66.1%
Great: 85%
Samsung 850 Evo 1TB-$110
62GB free
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 410 378 193 211 177 216 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)
90.1% Outstanding
Read 464
Write 447
Mixed 406
SusWrite 264
89% 395 MB/s
4K Read 38.6
4K Write 78.4
4K Mixed 37.7
148% 51.6 MB/s
DQ Read 211
DQ Write 245
DQ Mixed 203
160% 220 MB/s
Poor: 80%
This bench: 90.1%
Great: 133%
Samsung MZ7PC256HAFU-000DA 256GB
238GB free
Firmware: CXM02W1Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 18 18 12 12 11 11 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
51.8% Above average
Read 455
Write 38.5
Mixed 60
SusWrite 13.6
30% 142 MB/s
4K Read 20.6
4K Write 48.4
4K Mixed 26.4
91% 31.8 MB/s
DQ Read 193
DQ Write 10.7
DQ Mixed 23.3
37% 75.8 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 51.8%
Great: 82%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL F4 DDR4 3300 C16 4x16GB
4 of 8 slots used
64GB DIMM DDR4 2133 MHz clocked @ 1067 MHz
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
68.6% Good
MC Read 25.3
MC Write 24.5
MC Mixed 22.6
69% 24.1 GB/s
SC Read 19.4
SC Write 26.7
SC Mixed 22.4
65% 22.8 GB/s
Latency 90
44% 90 ns
Poor: 67%
This bench: 68.6%
Great: 106%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical ROG STRIX X399-E GAMING Builds (Compare 352 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 122%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 86%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 148%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus ROG STRIX X399-E GAMING

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 88% - Excellent Total price: $925
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback