HP EliteBook 8770w

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 57%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (23rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 77 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 59%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics6.82% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive43.1% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Very high background CPU (62%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemHP EliteBook 8770w  (all builds)
MotherboardHewlett-Packard 176C
Memory7.9 GB free of 12 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20161007
Uptime0 Days
Run DateOct 28 '18 at 16:05
Run Duration112 Seconds
Run User FIN-User
Background CPU 62%

 PC Performing below expectations (23rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-3740QM-$220
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.7 GHz
Performing way below expectations (19th percentile)
59% Above average
Memory 76.7
1-Core 74.1
2-Core 126
57% 92.2 Pts
4-Core 224
8-Core 363
36% 294 Pts
64-Core 377
23% 377 Pts
Poor: 40%
This bench: 59%
Great: 74%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia Quadro K3000M
HP(103C 176C) 2GB
CLim: 653 MHz, MLim: 700 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 391.25
Performing as expected (41st percentile)
6.82% Terrible
Lighting 7.47
Reflection 6.85
Parallax 8.97
6% 7.76 fps
MRender 10.1
Gravity 8.7
Splatting 11
8% 9.93 fps
Poor: 6%
This bench: 6.82%
Great: 8%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Micron C400 RealSSD 256GB
79GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 08TH
SusWrite @10s intervals: 118 152 78 101 105 141 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
43.1% Average
Read 336
Write 177
Mixed 205
SusWrite 116
46% 208 MB/s
4K Read 16.7
4K Write 45.7
4K Mixed 9.3
61% 23.9 MB/s
DQ Read 113
DQ Write 106
DQ Mixed 14.6
37% 77.9 MB/s
Poor: 41%
This bench: 43.1%
Great: 69%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471B5173QH0-YK0 M471B5173DB0-YK0 M471B5173DB0-YK0 12GB
1600, 1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 4096, 4096 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
49.5% Average
MC Read 19
MC Write 17.9
MC Mixed 15.6
50% 17.5 GB/s
SC Read 13.8
SC Write 13.3
SC Mixed 14.4
40% 13.8 GB/s
Latency 86.8
46% 86.8 ns
Poor: 29%
This bench: 49.5%
Great: 49%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical EliteBook 8770w Builds (Compare 566 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 10%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 62%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 9%
Tree trunk

System: HP EliteBook 8770w

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 86% - Excellent Total price: $100
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing charade so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit a lot from flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they've no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products, which UserBenchmark reveals.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. The 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we've dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data which saves our users millions every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $176Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback