PC Status | Overall this PC is performing above expectations (61st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 39 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. |
Processor | With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 74.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good. |
Graphics | 27.5% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Boot Drive | 83% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times. |
Memory | 12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing. |
OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
Motherboard | Asus P8P67 PRO REV 3.1 (all builds) |
Memory | 7.6 GB free of 12 GB @ 2.1 GHz |
Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit색 |
OS | Windows 10 |
BIOS Date | 20121101 |
Uptime | 0.3 Days |
Run Date | Oct 28 '18 at 01:06 |
Run Duration | 155 Seconds |
Run User | KOR-User |
Background CPU | 25% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
Intel Core i5-2500K-$246
LGA1155, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 4.5 GHz (avg)
|
74.9%
Very good
|
|||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
Nvidia GTX 670-$435
Zotac(19DA 1265) 2GB
CLim: 1241 MHz, MLim: 1552 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 416.34
Performing below potential (66th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
27.5%
Poor
|
|||
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
Samsung 850 Evo 120GB-$80
34GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 308 121 117 111 107 108 MB/s
|
83%
Excellent
|
|||
WD WD20EURX 2TB-$39
963GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 136 135 139 141 140 140 MB/s
|
62.2%
Good
|
|||
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016)-$85
691GB free
Firmware: CC26
SusWrite @10s intervals: 124 132 137 137 138 138 MB/s
|
99.5%
Outstanding
|
|||
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 3TB-$75
641GB free
Firmware: CC26
SusWrite @10s intervals: 121 126 129 129 127 129 MB/s
|
92.9%
Outstanding
|
|||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
Samsung M378B5773DH0-CH9 M378B5173QH0-CK0 M378B5773DH0-CH9 M378B5173QH0-CK0 12GB
2133, 2133, 2133, 2133 MHz
2048, 4096, 2048, 4096 MB
|
64.4%
Good
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
Core i7-2600KIntel $319Bench 71%, 147,533 samples | 161x |
Core i5-2500KIntel $246Bench 66%, 143,007 samples | 153x |
Core i7-2600Intel $178Bench 67%, 185,630 samples | 43x |
GPU | |
---|---|
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples | 40x |
GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples | 36x |
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 29x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 73% - Very good | Total price: $512 |