Asus G73Jw

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU, SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (25th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 75 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 52.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (22%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemAsus G73Jw  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK G73Jw
Memory5.1 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20110127
Uptime0.9 Days
Run DateOct 27 '18 at 14:54
Run Duration419 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 22%

 PC Performing below expectations (25th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7 Q 740-$190
Socket 989, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 1.75 GHz, turbo 1.7 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (30th percentile)
52.2% Above average
Memory 85.5
1-Core 40
2-Core 89
48% 71.5 Pts
4-Core 118
8-Core 82.7
14% 101 Pts
64-Core 196
12% 196 Pts
Poor: 38%
This bench: 52.2%
Great: 62%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Seagate ST4000LM016-1N2170 4TB
566GB free
Firmware: 0003
SusWrite @10s intervals: 57 59 56 53 57 55 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (20th percentile)
38.9% Below average
Read 77.7
Write 82.7
Mixed 64.2
SusWrite 56
52% 70.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 6.1
4K Mixed 0.5
185% 2.33 MB/s
Poor: 27%
This bench: 38.9%
Great: 66%
Seagate ST2000LM003 HN-M201RAD 2TB
871GB free
Firmware: 2BC10006
SusWrite @10s intervals: 55 62 70 71 53 55 MB/s
Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
42.6% Average
Read 86.8
Write 94
Mixed 49
SusWrite 60.9
53% 72.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 3
4K Mixed 0.8
170% 1.47 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 42.6%
Great: 70%
Seagate Momentus 2.5" 500GB-$49
385GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 0003SDM1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 52 65 41 38 59 59 MB/s
Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)
37.2% Below average
Read 77.5
Write 58.7
Mixed 44
SusWrite 52.3
43% 58.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 0.8
4K Mixed 0.6
102% 0.63 MB/s
Poor: 18%
This bench: 37.2%
Great: 58%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown EBJ21UE8BFU0-DJ-F 4x2GB
4 of 4 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR3 1333 MHz
Performing below potential (18th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
37.5% Below average
MC Read 14.6
MC Write 11.7
MC Mixed 13.1
38% 13.1 GB/s
SC Read 5.2
SC Write 8.8
SC Mixed 9.3
22% 7.77 GB/s
Latency 71.6
56% 71.6 ns
Poor: 36%
This bench: 37.5%
Great: 48%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical G73Jw Builds (Compare 98 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 54%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

System: Asus G73Jw

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 52% - Above average Total price: $225
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark challenges their narrative so they attack our reputation with a co-ordinated charade.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of profit on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, UserBenchmark's data exposes the youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar PC brands, we've dedicated 13 years to publishing real-world data which collectively saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback