Asus K5130

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 58%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (58th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 42 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 62.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics4.04% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
SystemAsus K5130  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK K5130
Memory4.5 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20130410
Uptime0 Days
Run DateOct 27 '18 at 07:26
Run Duration139 Seconds
Run User ROU-User
Background CPU8%

 PC Performing as expected (58th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3-3220T-$80
LGA1155, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.8 GHz
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
62.4% Good
Memory 92.3
1-Core 76.8
2-Core 141
64% 104 Pts
4-Core 190
8-Core 195
26% 192 Pts
64-Core 195
12% 195 Pts
Poor: 45%
This bench: 62.4%
Great: 62%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 630
Asus(1043 8598) 2GB
CLim: 875 MHz, MLim: 445 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 398.11
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
4.04% Terrible
Lighting 4.43
Reflection 4.08
Parallax 4.56
4% 4.36 fps
MRender 5.19
Gravity 5.03
Splatting 7.09
5% 5.77 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 4.04%
Great: 5%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$28
142GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 80.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 92 80 77 54 51 42 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
32.8% Below average
Read 48
Write 82.3
Mixed 39.3
SusWrite 66
43% 58.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.7
126% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 32.8%
Great: 109%
WD Elements 25A2 1TB
213GB free, PID 25a2
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 65 63 66 64 67 66 MB/s
Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)
28.9% Poor
Read 60
Write 60.8
Mixed 38.2
SusWrite 65.2
76% 56 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.9
97% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 28.9%
Great: 63%
Seagate Expansion Desk 250GB
127GB free, PID 3312
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 81 79 79 80 80 81 MB/s
Performing above expectations (61st percentile)
33.7% Below average
Read 81
Write 83.3
Mixed 52
SusWrite 80.2
100% 74.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.9
80% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 9%
This bench: 33.7%
Great: 174%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston ASU16D3LU1KBG/4G 99U5584-009.A00LF 8GB
1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
55.4% Above average
MC Read 19.2
MC Write 20.7
MC Mixed 17.9
55% 19.3 GB/s
SC Read 15.3
SC Write 14.6
SC Mixed 16
44% 15.3 GB/s
Latency 63.4
63% 63.4 ns
Poor: 47%
This bench: 55.4%
Great: 58%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical K5130 Builds (Compare 127 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 55%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

System: Asus K5130

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 21% - Poor Total price: $28
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. UserBenchmark exposes their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make lots of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't care about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing sponsorship with billion-dollar brands, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback