Intel S2600CWR

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU, SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (51st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 49 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 72.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
MotherboardIntel S2600CWR  (all builds)
Memory8.5 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1024 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20160331
Uptime4 Days
Run DateOct 26 '18 at 14:15
Run Duration118 Seconds
Run User BRA-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing as expected (51st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
1st CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2630 v4
CPU1, 2 CPU, 20 cores, 40 threads
Base clock 2.2 GHz
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
72.4% Very good
Memory 82.8
1-Core 73.9
2-Core 178
64% 111 Pts
4-Core 334
8-Core 621
57% 477 Pts
64-Core 2,034
126% 2,034 Pts
Poor: 54%
This bench: 72.4%
Great: 73%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016)-$62
1.5TB free (System drive)
Firmware: CC26
SusWrite @10s intervals: 197 201 194 186 186 193 MB/s
Performing below expectations (23rd percentile)
78.2% Very good
Read 80
Write 114
Mixed 46.8
SusWrite 193
79% 108 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.8
145% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 63%
This bench: 78.2%
Great: 114%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB-$28
458GB free
Firmware: CC47
SusWrite @10s intervals: 158 160 159 156 158 158 MB/s
Performing below expectations (35th percentile)
84.6% Excellent
Read 136
Write 96
Mixed 79.3
SusWrite 158
86% 118 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 1
185% 1.33 MB/s
Poor: 55%
This bench: 84.6%
Great: 112%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 9965640-001.C00G 1x16GB
1 of 16 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 2133 MHz clocked @ 2134 MHz
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
31.5% Below average
MC Read 15.1
MC Write 7.9
MC Mixed 9.5
31% 10.8 GB/s
SC Read 7.4
SC Write 4.4
SC Mixed 7.7
19% 6.5 GB/s
Latency 75.5
53% 75.5 ns
Poor: 31%
This bench: 31.5%
Great: 39%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical S2600CWR Builds (Compare 23 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 71%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 72%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 77%
Battleship

Motherboard: Intel S2600CWR

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 111% - Outstanding Total price: $223
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year so they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $156Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback