Dell XPS 8900

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 16%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 78%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 15%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (58th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 42 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 79.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics10.9% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Memory24GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 24GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (76%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
5 years ago, 5 years ago.
SystemDell XPS 8900  (all builds)
MotherboardDell 0XJ8C4
Memory21.1 GB free of 24 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1600 x 1200 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180725
Uptime0 Days
Run DateOct 25 '18 at 19:22
Run Duration240 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 76%

 PC Performing as expected (58th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-6700-$170
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
79.2% Very good
Memory 88.3
1-Core 110
2-Core 206
78% 135 Pts
4-Core 378
8-Core 620
61% 499 Pts
64-Core 652
40% 652 Pts
Poor: 60%
This bench: 79.2%
Great: 80%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 745 (OEM)-$60
Nvidia(10DE 1065) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1032 MHz, MLim: 450 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 416.34
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
10.9% Very poor
Lighting 13.5
Reflection 13.3
Parallax 10
11% 12.3 fps
MRender 11.6
Gravity 12.4
Splatting 14.4
11% 12.8 fps
Poor: 9%
This bench: 10.9%
Great: 10%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100
88GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 804 260 254 249 247 238 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 72% Great: 124%
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100
85GB free
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 194 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)
85.8% Excellent
Read 454
Write 430
Mixed 352
SusWrite 32.7
71% 317 MB/s
4K Read 38
4K Write 76.2
4K Mixed 50.7
163% 55 MB/s
DQ Read 351
DQ Write 303
DQ Mixed 323
243% 326 MB/s
Poor: 72%
This bench: 85.8%
Great: 124%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB-$28
394GB free
Firmware: CC45
SusWrite @10s intervals: 85 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
50.6% Above average
Read 162
Write 138
Mixed 80
SusWrite 14.5
73% 98.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 0.9
162% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 55%
This bench: 50.6%
Great: 112%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M378A1G43DB0-CPB M378A1G43DB0-CPB M378A5143DB0-CPB M378A5143DB0-CPB 24GB
2133, 2133, 2133, 2133 MHz
8192, 8192, 4096, 4096 MB
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
75.3% Very good
MC Read 26.5
MC Write 29
MC Mixed 24.1
76% 26.5 GB/s
SC Read 16.6
SC Write 30.4
SC Mixed 23.5
67% 23.5 GB/s
Latency 69.2
58% 69.2 ns
Poor: 66%
This bench: 75.3%
Great: 77%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical XPS 8900 Builds (Compare 2,805 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 15%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 72%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 13%
Tree trunk

System: Dell XPS 8900

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 56% - Above average Total price: $370
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback