Asus SABERTOOTH X79

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 24%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 85%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 22%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (61st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 39 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 84.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics16.9% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive110% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardAsus SABERTOOTH X79  (all builds)
Memory28 GB free of 32 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20140725
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateOct 25 '18 at 15:03
Run Duration157 Seconds
Run User GRC-User
Background CPU3%

 PC Performing above expectations (61st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-3960X-$265
LGA2011, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.15 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
84.8% Excellent
Memory 93.7
1-Core 107
2-Core 194
77% 131 Pts
4-Core 410
8-Core 664
66% 537 Pts
64-Core 811
50% 811 Pts
Poor: 66%
This bench: 84.8%
Great: 89%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GTX 750
Nvidia(10DE 1407) 2GB
CLim: 1202 MHz, MLim: 1300 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 390.65
Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)
16.9% Very poor
Lighting 19.5
Reflection 16.7
Parallax 13.9
16% 16.7 fps
MRender 23.6
Gravity 18.4
Splatting 26
19% 22.7 fps
Poor: 15%
This bench: 16.9%
Great: 18%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Intel Raid 0 Volume 360GB
126GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1.0.
SusWrite @10s intervals: 256 272 289 287 276 253 MB/s
Performing above expectations (66th percentile)
110% Outstanding
Read 763
Write 363
Mixed 338
SusWrite 272
96% 434 MB/s
4K Read 27.2
4K Write 148
4K Mixed 34.5
164% 69.8 MB/s
DQ Read 275
DQ Write 338
DQ Mixed 223
191% 278 MB/s
Poor: 61%
This bench: 110%
Great: 147%
Adaptec Array 120GB
29GB free
Firmware: V1.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 321 146 146 146 146 146 MB/s
Performing as expected (55th percentile)
42% Average
Read 365
Write 391
Mixed 308
SusWrite 175
70% 310 MB/s
4K Read 12.9
4K Write 18.1
4K Mixed 13.8
47% 14.9 MB/s
DQ Read 21.2
DQ Write 73.5
DQ Mixed 116
69% 70.1 MB/s
Poor: 28%
This bench: 42%
Great: 75%
Adaptec Array 3TB
543GB free
Firmware: V1.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 109 103 103 104 102 103 MB/s
Performing as expected (53rd percentile)
67.6% Good
Read 131
Write 193
Mixed 90
SusWrite 104
95% 129 MB/s
4K Read 1.3
4K Write 2.7
4K Mixed 0.7
182% 1.57 MB/s
Poor: 50%
This bench: 67.6%
Great: 90%
Adaptec Array 319GB
26GB free
Firmware: V1.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 49 49 48 48 48 48 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
27.5% Poor
Read 47
Write 70.7
Mixed 31
SusWrite 48.5
36% 49.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.4
87% 0.73 MB/s
Poor: 27%
This bench: 27.5%
Great: 77%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair CMZ8GX3M2A1600C9 CMZ8GX3M2A2133C11 CMZ8GX3M2A1600C9 CMZ8GX3M2A2133C11 CMZ8GX3M1A1600C10 CMZ8GX3M2A2133C11 CMZ6GX3M3A1600C8 CMZ6GX3M3A1600C8 32GB
1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz
4096, 4096, 4096, 4096, 8192, 4096, 2048, 2048 MB
Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
97.1% Outstanding
MC Read 39.4
MC Write 38.7
MC Mixed 35.3
108% 37.8 GB/s
SC Read 16.5
SC Write 14.5
SC Mixed 13.6
42% 14.9 GB/s
Latency 60.5
66% 60.5 ns
Poor: 71%
This bench: 97.1%
Great: 98%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical SABERTOOTH X79 Builds (Compare 1,815 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 45%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 39%
Jet ski

Motherboard: Asus SABERTOOTH X79 - $335

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 80% - Excellent Total price: $727
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $245Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback