Asus SABERTOOTH X79

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 23%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 82%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 22%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (59th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 41 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 80.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics17.6% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive107% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardAsus SABERTOOTH X79  (all builds)
Memory27.1 GB free of 32 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20140725
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateOct 24 '18 at 21:54
Run Duration158 Seconds
Run User GRC-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing as expected (59th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-3960X-$265
LGA2011, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 2.95 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (74th percentile)
80.5% Excellent
Memory 93.3
1-Core 77.8
2-Core 200
71% 124 Pts
4-Core 366
8-Core 617
60% 491 Pts
64-Core 758
47% 758 Pts
Poor: 66%
This bench: 80.5%
Great: 89%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GTX 750
Nvidia(10DE 1407) 2GB
CLim: 1240 MHz, MLim: 1252 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 390.65
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
17.6% Very poor
Lighting 20.4
Reflection 17.2
Parallax 14.2
17% 17.3 fps
MRender 23.9
Gravity 19.2
Splatting 26.8
19% 23.3 fps
Poor: 15%
This bench: 17.6%
Great: 18%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Intel Raid 0 Volume 360GB
126GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1.0.
SusWrite @10s intervals: 298 258 263 264 257 254 MB/s
Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)
107% Outstanding
Read 776
Write 319
Mixed 316
SusWrite 266
92% 419 MB/s
4K Read 26.9
4K Write 140
4K Mixed 31
155% 66 MB/s
DQ Read 260
DQ Write 340
DQ Mixed 201
179% 267 MB/s
Poor: 61%
This bench: 107%
Great: 147%
Adaptec Array 120GB
29GB free
Firmware: V1.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 323 146 146 146 146 146 MB/s
Performing as expected (55th percentile)
42.1% Average
Read 368
Write 390
Mixed 317
SusWrite 175
70% 312 MB/s
4K Read 13.1
4K Write 17.9
4K Mixed 14
47% 15 MB/s
DQ Read 21.3
DQ Write 67.9
DQ Mixed 114
67% 67.8 MB/s
Poor: 28%
This bench: 42.1%
Great: 75%
Adaptec Array 3TB
543GB free
Firmware: V1.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 108 103 103 102 102 103 MB/s
Performing as expected (53rd percentile)
68.1% Good
Read 134
Write 194
Mixed 91.8
SusWrite 104
96% 131 MB/s
4K Read 1.2
4K Write 2.6
4K Mixed 0.7
176% 1.5 MB/s
Poor: 50%
This bench: 68.1%
Great: 90%
Adaptec Array 319GB
26GB free
Firmware: V1.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 46 49 49 49 49 49 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
27.4% Poor
Read 46.7
Write 68.5
Mixed 31
SusWrite 48.4
36% 48.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.4
91% 0.77 MB/s
Poor: 27%
This bench: 27.4%
Great: 77%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair CMZ8GX3M2A1600C9 CMZ8GX3M2A2133C11 CMZ8GX3M2A1600C9 CMZ8GX3M2A2133C11 CMZ8GX3M1A1600C10 CMZ8GX3M2A2133C11 CMZ6GX3M3A1600C8 CMZ6GX3M3A1600C8 32GB
1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz
4096, 4096, 4096, 4096, 8192, 4096, 2048, 2048 MB
Performing above expectations (60th percentile)
95.6% Outstanding
MC Read 38.7
MC Write 38
MC Mixed 35
106% 37.2 GB/s
SC Read 16.3
SC Write 13.8
SC Mixed 13.5
42% 14.5 GB/s
Latency 61.4
65% 61.4 ns
Poor: 71%
This bench: 95.6%
Great: 98%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical SABERTOOTH X79 Builds (Compare 1,815 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 45%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 39%
Jet ski

Motherboard: Asus SABERTOOTH X79 - $335

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 80% - Excellent Total price: $727
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $245Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback