Toshiba SATELLITE M50-A

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 1%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 46%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 1%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (74th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 26 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 51.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics2.65% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (17%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemToshiba SATELLITE M50-A  (all builds)
MotherboardTOSHIBA ZEMAA
Memory1.8 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20130916
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 28 '16 at 16:14
Run Duration189 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU 17%

 PC Performing above expectations (74th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3-4005U
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 1.7 GHz, turbo 1.7 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
51.8% Above average
Memory 81.9
1-Core 48.9
2-Core 83.6
48% 71.5 Pts
4-Core 128
8-Core 129
17% 129 Pts
64-Core 130
8% 130 Pts
Poor: 18%
This bench: 51.8%
Great: 52%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 4400 (Mobile 1.0/1.1 GHz)
Toshiba(1179 FAD0) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 20.19.15.4331
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
2.65% Terrible
Lighting 2.83
Reflection 4
Parallax 4.94
2% 3.92 fps
MRender 3.86
Gravity 1.8
Splatting 5.83
3% 3.83 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 2.65%
Great: 3%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Hitachi HTS545050A7E380 500GB
137GB free (System drive)
Firmware: GG2OAH20
Performing as expected (54th percentile)
43% Average
Read 73.1
Write 76.7
Mixed 52.9
50% 67.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.33
4K Write 1.31
4K Mixed 0.13
52% 0.59 MB/s
Poor: 17%
This bench: 43%
Great: 58%
Samsung SSD 840 EVO 250G 250GB
233GB free, PID 0c25
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
71% Very good
Read 40.5
Write 36.4
Mixed 38.3
49% 38.4 MB/s
4K Read 12.3
4K Write 17.7
4K Mixed 10
988% 13.3 MB/s
DQ Read 14.2
DQ Write 20.1
DQ Mixed 10.1
1,078% 14.8 MB/s
Poor: 31%
This bench: 71%
Great: 72%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471B5173BH0-YK0 1x4GB
1 of 4 slots used
4GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing as expected (60th percentile)
29.5% Poor
MC Read 10.3
MC Write 10
MC Mixed 8.5
27% 9.6 GB/s
SC Read 8
SC Write 8
SC Mixed 8.8
24% 8.27 GB/s
Latency 77
52% 77 ns
Poor: 11%
This bench: 29.5%
Great: 32%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical SATELLITE M50-A Builds (Compare 31 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 43%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk

System: Toshiba SATELLITE M50-A

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 41% - Average Total price: $319
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback