Asus F1A55-M

Performance Results


Gaming 6% Tree trunk	Desktop 41% Speed boat	Workstation 5% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (28th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 72 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 41.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics	6.49% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive	32.9% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (50%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago.

Motherboard	Asus F1A55-M (all builds)
Memory	5.4 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20110829
Uptime	0.2 Days
Run Date	Oct 25 '18 at 00:07
Run Duration	129 Seconds
Run User	ARG-User
Background CPU	50%

PC Performing below expectations (28^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD A8-3870 APU-$81 6,332 User benchmarks, average bench 47% FM1 , 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 2.35 GHz (avg) Performing below expectations (21^st percentile)	41.2% Average	Memory 56.1 1-Core 43.3 2-Core 79.4 38% 59.6 Pts	4-Core 155 8-Core 147 20% 151 Pts	64-Core 141 9% 141 Pts
Poor: 35% ↑ This bench: 41.2% Great: 56%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD R7 240 58,337 User benchmarks, average bench 5% Gigabyte(1458 22B0) 2GB CLim: 900 MHz, MLim: 800 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 18.9.1 Performing above expectations (83^rd percentile)	6.49% Terrible	Lighting 8.07 Reflection 9.73 Parallax 10.3 7% 9.36 fps	MRender 7.05 Gravity 7.23 Splatting 8.52 6% 7.6 fps
Poor: 4% ↑ This bench: 6.49% Great: 6%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Kingston SSDNow V300 240GB-$35 176,713 User benchmarks, average bench 64% 41GB free (System drive) Firmware: 603ABBF0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 109 52 70 72 95 67 MB/s Performing way below expectations (3^rd percentile)	32.9% Below average	Read 85 Write 171 Mixed 160 SusWrite 77.5 28% 124 MB/s	4K Read 12.1 4K Write 47.2 4K Mixed 22 72% 27.1 MB/s	DQ Read 25.4 DQ Write 76.4 DQ Mixed 16.8 23% 39.5 MB/s
Poor: 41% ↑ This bench: 32.9% Great: 85%
WD Blue 500GB (2010)-$20 496,077 User benchmarks, average bench 53% 116GB free Firmware: 15.01H15 SusWrite @10s intervals: 72 72 72 72 73 71 MB/s Performing below expectations (24^th percentile)	44% Average	Read 81 Write 75.5 Mixed 56.2 SusWrite 72 52% 71.2 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1.7 4K Mixed 0.9 161% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 24% ↑ This bench: 44% Great: 69%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston 99U5471-012.A00LF 99U5471-020.A00LF 8GB 577 User benchmarks, average bench 48% 1333, 1333 MHz 4096, 4096 MB Performing way below expectations (7^th percentile)	28.4% Poor	MC Read 11.6 MC Write 10.2 MC Mixed 9.8 30% 10.5 GB/s	SC Read 5.2 SC Write 4 SC Mixed 6.6 15% 5.27 GB/s	Latency 140 29% 140 ns
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 28.4% Great: 55%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical F1A55-M Builds (Compare 20 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 7%

Tree trunk

Desktop 46%

Yacht

Workstation 6%

Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus F1A55-M

CPU
A8-3870 APUAMD $81Bench 47%, 6,332 samples	6x
A6-3670 APUAMDBench 46%, 2,400 samples	3x
A6-3650 APUAMDBench 44%, 2,748 samples	3x

GPU
Radeon HD 6550DAMDBench 4%, 4,197 samples	3x
Radeon HD 6530DAMDBench 3%, 4,675 samples	2x
GTX 550-TiNvidia $250Bench 9%, 54,392 samples	2x

SSD
MX500 1TBCrucial $81Bench 106%, 202,785 samples	2x
VERTEX PLUS 120GBOCZBench 31%, 765 samples	2x
Green 240GB (2018)WD $51Bench 45%, 156,194 samples	2x

RAM
1333EL Series 2x4GBUnknownBench 43%, 878 samples	2x
KHX1600C9D3/4GX 8GBH2X04E99927-15 KHX1600C9D3/4GX SUPERTALENT02 20GBKingstonBench 30%, 3 samples	2x
99U5471-020.A00LF 1x4GBKingstonBench 26%, 3,387 samples	1x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 56% - Above average

Total price: $162

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $175	Nvidia RTX 4070 $550	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16