MSI 870A-G54 (MS-7599)

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 53%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 3%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (53rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 47 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 61.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics5.07% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
SystemMSI MS-7599
MotherboardMSI 870A-G54 (MS-7599)  (all builds)
Memory4.3 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.5 GHz
Display1280 x 1024 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20121127
Uptime0.5 Days
Run DateOct 24 '18 at 19:39
Run Duration201 Seconds
Run User LTU-User
Background CPU6%

 PC Performing as expected (53rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Phenom II X4 955-$83
CPU1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
61.2% Good
Memory 88.5
1-Core 51.4
2-Core 104
53% 81.1 Pts
4-Core 198
8-Core 204
27% 201 Pts
64-Core 208
13% 208 Pts
Poor: 38%
This bench: 61.2%
Great: 60%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon HD 5570
Gigabyte(1458 21E0) 1GB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 8.850.0.0
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
5.07% Terrible
Lighting 6.33
Reflection 7
Parallax 5.25
5% 6.19 fps
MRender 6.52
Gravity 4.47
Splatting 6.74
5% 5.91 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 5.07%
Great: 5%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Intenso 128GB 128GB
17GB free (System drive)
Firmware: N0530A
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 343
Write 299
Mixed 219
64% 287 MB/s
4K Read 30.5
4K Write 59
4K Mixed 28.1
114% 39.2 MB/s
DQ Read 29.6
DQ Write 59.9
DQ Mixed 38
31% 42.5 MB/s
Poor: 48% Great: 96%
Seagate ST3160318AS 160GB-$43
12GB free
Firmware: CC45
SusWrite @10s intervals: 84 85 83 85 84 87 MB/s
Performing as expected (54th percentile)
43.3% Average
Read 65.9
Write 67
Mixed 42
SusWrite 84.8
48% 64.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 1
172% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 43.3%
Great: 58%
WD Green 1.5TB (2010)-$176
9GB free
Firmware: 51.0AB51
SusWrite @10s intervals: MB/s
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
12.9% Very poor
Read 41.3
Write 41.1
Mixed 31.2
SusWrite 3
22% 29.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.6
121% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 26%
This bench: 12.9%
Great: 63%
Kingston DataTraveler 100 G3 USB 3.0 16GB-$7
8GB free, PID 1666
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2.1 8.3 8.4 8.4 8.4 9.3 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete
Read 18.9
Write 11.7
SusWrite 7.5
14% 12.7 MB/s
4K Read 1.8
4K Mixed 0
10% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 5% Great: 23%
USB FLASH DRIVE 64GB
19GB free, PID b113
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 4.7 5.6 5 5.3 5.3 5.1 MB/s
Performing below expectations (34th percentile)
3.5% Terrible
Read 11.9
Write 1.7
Mixed 4.3
SusWrite 5.1
6% 5.75 MB/s
4K Read 2.8
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
10% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 2%
This bench: 3.5%
Great: 7%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Adata Hynix HMT325U6CFR8C-H9 Samsung M378B5673FH0-CH9 8GB
1460, 1460, 1460, 1460 MHz
2048, 2048, 2048, 2048 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
35.7% Below average
MC Read 15.4
MC Write 8.2
MC Mixed 13.2
35% 12.3 GB/s
SC Read 7.2
SC Write 7.2
SC Mixed 9.3
23% 7.9 GB/s
Latency 69.1
58% 69.1 ns
Poor: 34%
This bench: 35.7%
Great: 36%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 870A-G54 (MS-7599) Builds (Compare 57 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 51%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: MSI 870A-G54 (MS-7599)

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 47% - Average Total price: $177
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. Because UserBenchmark’s data often contradicts their marketing spiel, they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of money on flagship hardware sales: 4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc. We help consumers get comparable real-world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Additionally, brands spend more on marketing weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated the last 13 years to providing comprehensive and accurate data to our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again and collectively save millions every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback