Performance Results


Gaming 2% Tree trunk	Desktop 49% Yacht	Workstation 2% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (60th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 40 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 52.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics	0.84% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	34.4% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (54%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing as expected (60^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5 650-$70 42,063 User benchmarks, average bench 46% CPU 1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.15 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (93^rd percentile)	52.4% Above average	Memory 70.4 1-Core 78 2-Core 116 54% 88 Pts	4-Core 202 8-Core 200 27% 201 Pts	64-Core 200 12% 200 Pts
Poor: 33% ↑ This bench: 52.4% Great: 53%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel HD Graphics (Clarkdale 0.733/0.9 GHz) 20,588 User benchmarks, average bench 1% Legend(17AA 306A) 1.8GB Driver: igdumd64.dll Ver. 8.15.10.2900 Performing as expected (50^th percentile)	0.84% Terrible	Lighting 0.93 Reflection 1.15 Parallax 0.91 1% 1 fps	MRender 1.43 Gravity 0.73 Splatting 1.43 1% 1.2 fps
Poor: 1% ↑ This bench: 0.84% Great: 1%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Sandisk S128G 126GB 21,984 User benchmarks, average bench 42% 76GB free (System drive) Firmware: 3.2.0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 170 174 199 185 180 195 MB/s Performing below potential (28^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	34.4% Below average	Read 236 Write 186 Mixed 75.7 SusWrite 184 38% 170 MB/s	4K Read 14.2 4K Write 11.1 4K Mixed 11.1 42% 12.1 MB/s	DQ Read 30.9 DQ Write 13.3 DQ Mixed 14.8 13% 19.7 MB/s
Poor: 29% ↑ This bench: 34.4% Great: 56%
ChipsBnk SD/MMCReader 2GB 26 User benchmarks, average bench 4% 2GB free, PID 1307 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 11 10 10 10 10 10 MB/s Performing way above expectations (91^st percentile)	5.97% Terrible	Read 12 Write 10.5 Mixed 10.7 SusWrite 10.1 15% 10.8 MB/s	4K Read 4.7 4K Write 0.3 4K Mixed 0.5 45% 1.83 MB/s
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 5.97% Great: 6%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Ramaxel RMT3020EC58E9F1333 1x4GB 2,506 User benchmarks, average bench 25% 1 of 2 slots used 4GB DIMM DDR3 1333 MHz Performing below potential (36^th percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	23.8% Poor	MC Read 7.5 MC Write 8.4 MC Mixed 7.5 22% 7.8 GB/s	SC Read 6.9 SC Write 6.6 SC Mixed 7 20% 6.83 GB/s	Latency 100 40% 100 ns
Poor: 12% ↑ This bench: 23.8% Great: 29%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16