Asus M4A88T-V EVO/USB3

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 24%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 66%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 18%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (54th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 46 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 64.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics34.3% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive27.1% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
5 years ago, 5 years ago.
MotherboardAsus M4A88T-V EVO/USB3  (all builds)
Memory6.2 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit barev
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20101110
Uptime0.3 Days
Run DateOct 22 '18 at 18:20
Run Duration149 Seconds
Run User CZE-User
Background CPU8%

 PC Performing as expected (54th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Phenom II X4 955-$83
AM3, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
64.3% Good
Memory 87.6
1-Core 30.6
2-Core 118
50% 78.9 Pts
4-Core 241
8-Core 235
32% 238 Pts
64-Core 237
15% 237 Pts
Poor: 38%
This bench: 64.3%
Great: 60%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 960-$198
CLim: 1430 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 388.13
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
34.3% Below average
Lighting 44.5
Reflection 42
Parallax 37.8
36% 41.4 fps
MRender 39
Gravity 39.1
Splatting 34.4
30% 37.5 fps
Poor: 30%
This bench: 34.3%
Great: 36%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial M4 128GB-$116
23GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 000F
SusWrite @10s intervals: 89 87 91 71 34 36 MB/s
Performing below potential (0th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
27.1% Poor
Read 179
Write 124
Mixed 158
SusWrite 67.9
30% 132 MB/s
4K Read 15.5
4K Write 23
4K Mixed 10
48% 16.2 MB/s
DQ Read 16.6
DQ Write 45.6
DQ Mixed 12.3
15% 24.8 MB/s
Poor: 44%
This bench: 27.1%
Great: 72%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.12 1TB-$70
251GB free
Firmware: JC45
SusWrite @10s intervals: 91 92 94 94 91 87 MB/s
Performing as expected (41st percentile)
52.5% Above average
Read 91.3
Write 92.9
Mixed 57.3
SusWrite 91.4
61% 83.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.9
157% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 34%
This bench: 52.5%
Great: 68%
WD Green 2TB (2012)-$50
25GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 88 87 92 71 35 36 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (16th percentile)
48.7% Average
Read 101
Write 72.5
Mixed 64.4
SusWrite 68.1
56% 76.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2.4
4K Mixed 1
189% 1.4 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 48.7%
Great: 84%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 4x2GB
4 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
34.7% Below average
MC Read 15
MC Write 7.7
MC Mixed 12.9
34% 11.9 GB/s
SC Read 7.2
SC Write 6.6
SC Mixed 9.6
22% 7.8 GB/s
Latency 69.9
57% 69.9 ns
Poor: 14%
This bench: 34.7%
Great: 45%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical M4A88T-V EVO/USB3 Builds (Compare 59 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 18%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 64%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 14%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus M4A88T-V EVO/USB3

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 56% - Above average Total price: $372
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate a lot of reddit accounts. UserBenchmark exposes their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar brands, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data which saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback