Gigabyte GA-X299 UD4-CF

Performance Results


Gaming 77% Battleship	Desktop 92% Nuclear submarine	Workstation 78% Battleship


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (72nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 28 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 89.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	83.9% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	206% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

5 years ago, 5 years ago.

System	Gigabyte X299 UD4
Motherboard	Gigabyte GA-X299 UD4-CF (all builds)
Memory	11.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20180625
Uptime	0.7 Days
Run Date	Oct 22 '18 at 12:13
Run Duration	207 Seconds
Run User	FRA-User
Background CPU	6%

PC Performing above expectations (72^nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-7820X-$375 28,524 User benchmarks, average bench 80% , 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (95^th percentile)	89.9% Excellent	Memory 84.5 1-Core 128 2-Core 254 86% 156 Pts	4-Core 510 8-Core 988 89% 749 Pts	64-Core 1378 85% 1378 Pts
Poor: 70% ↑ This bench: 89.9% Great: 92%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 980-Ti-$560 214,030 User benchmarks, average bench 79% MSI(1462 3232) CLim: 1531 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 416.34 Performing way above expectations (85^th percentile)	83.9% Excellent	Lighting 107 Reflection 114 Parallax 103 87% 108 fps	MRender 94.7 Gravity 98.9 Splatting 93.3 78% 95.6 fps
Poor: 70% ↑ This bench: 83.9% Great: 87%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 250GB-$45 240,629 User benchmarks, average bench 199% 184GB free (System drive) Firmware: 2B7QCXE7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 1344 318 318 318 318 317 MB/s Performing as expected (57^th percentile)	206% Outstanding	Read 1893 Write 1,470 Mixed 704 SusWrite 489 252% 1,139 MB/s	4K Read 50.5 4K Write 163 4K Mixed 52.4 230% 88.6 MB/s	DQ Read 379 DQ Write 1,006 DQ Mixed 334 358% 573 MB/s
Poor: 142% ↑ This bench: 206% Great: 236%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$31 3,105,054 User benchmarks, average bench 83% 556GB free Firmware: 01.01A01 SusWrite @10s intervals: 146 147 146 147 146 146 MB/s Performing above expectations (68^th percentile)	92.5% Outstanding	Read 176 Write 137 Mixed 101 SusWrite 146 103% 140 MB/s	4K Read 1.3 4K Write 3.1 4K Mixed 1.2 245% 1.87 MB/s
Poor: 52% ↑ This bench: 92.5% Great: 109%
WD Blue 4TB (2015)-$85 124,615 User benchmarks, average bench 80% 3.5TB free Firmware: 80.00A80 SusWrite @10s intervals: 170 175 176 177 178 178 MB/s Performing way above expectations (96^th percentile)	101% Outstanding	Read 176 Write 173 Mixed 93.7 SusWrite 176 113% 155 MB/s	4K Read 0.9 4K Write 2.9 4K Mixed 1.1 213% 1.63 MB/s
Poor: 49% ↑ This bench: 101% Great: 101%
WDC WD10 EZEX-00BN5A0 1TB 37 User benchmarks, average bench 44% 726GB free, PID 0567 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 121 141 148 150 145 149 MB/s Performing way above expectations (93^rd percentile)	66.4% Good	Read 180 Write 156 Mixed 134 SusWrite 142 204% 153 MB/s	4K Read 1.5 4K Write 2.9 4K Mixed 1.2 145% 1.87 MB/s
Poor: 14% ↑ This bench: 66.4% Great: 67%
WDC WD40 EZRZ-00GXCB0 4TB 154 User benchmarks, average bench 39% 1.5TB free, PID 0567 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 0.1 0.1 0.1 0 0 4.5 MB/s Performing below expectations (27^th percentile)	25.3% Poor	Read 118 Write 122 Mixed 104 SusWrite 0.8 111% 86.3 MB/s	4K Read 1.1 4K Write 2.5 4K Mixed 1 123% 1.53 MB/s
Poor: 14% ↑ This bench: 25.3% Great: 68%
WDC WD40 EZRZ-00WN9B0 4TB 49 User benchmarks, average bench 41% 1TB free, PID 0567 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 145 140 149 148 144 137 MB/s Performing way above expectations (98^th percentile)	60.5% Good	Read 145 Write 144 Mixed 108 SusWrite 144 183% 135 MB/s	4K Read 0.9 4K Write 2.6 4K Mixed 1 126% 1.5 MB/s
Poor: 17% ↑ This bench: 60.5% Great: 61%
WDC WD60 EZRZ-00RWYB1 6TB 27 User benchmarks, average bench 46% 3TB free, PID 0567 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 0 0.1 0.1 0 0.1 4.4 MB/s Performing below expectations (26^th percentile)	32.5% Below average	Read 162 Write 152 Mixed 120 SusWrite 0.8 136% 108 MB/s	4K Read 1 4K Write 2.8 4K Mixed 1 133% 1.6 MB/s
Poor: 29% ↑ This bench: 32.5% Great: 62%
Intenso Micro Line 16GB 15 User benchmarks, average bench 6% 14GB free, PID 2910 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 2.6 3.8 3.8 3.2 3.7 3.8 MB/s Performing way above expectations (92^nd percentile)	6.5% Terrible	Read 27.2 Write 8.8 Mixed 7.3 SusWrite 3.5 12% 11.7 MB/s	4K Read 7.6 4K Write 0 4K Mixed 0 28% 2.53 MB/s
Poor: 5% ↑ This bench: 6.5% Great: 7%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 2x8GB 236,291 User benchmarks, average bench 64% 2 of 8 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz Performing as expected (52^nd percentile)	60.3% Good	MC Read 20.8 MC Write 28.7 MC Mixed 16.7 63% 22.1 GB/s	SC Read 8.1 SC Write 21.8 SC Mixed 10.8 39% 13.6 GB/s	Latency 72.7 55% 72.7 ns
Poor: 29% ↑ This bench: 60.3% Great: 97%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical GA-X299 UD4-CF Builds (Compare 158 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 99%

Nuclear submarine

Desktop 83%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 93%

Nuclear submarine

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-X299 UD4-CF

CPU
Core i7-7800XIntel $216Bench 78%, 22,334 samples	47x
Core i7-7820XIntel $375Bench 80%, 28,524 samples	39x
Core i9-7900XIntel $393Bench 82%, 19,432 samples	29x

GPU
GTX 1080-TiNvidia $485Bench 124%, 840,268 samples	28x
GTX 1080Nvidia $195Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples	14x
GTX 1070-TiNvidia $299Bench 94%, 412,133 samples	9x

SSD
850 Evo 500GBSamsung $94Bench 112%, 695,664 samples	9x
Blue SN550 NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBWD $74Bench 228%, 180,890 samples	6x
960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung $43Bench 213%, 165,668 samples	6x

RAM
2x16GBUnknownBench 91%, 46,387 samples	26x
4x8GBUnknownBench 70%, 41,916 samples	25x
2x8GBUnknownBench 64%, 236,291 samples	18x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 63% - Good

Total price: $795

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $176	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $31	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16