MSI Z170M MORTAR (MS-7972)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 28%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 78%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 23%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (51st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 49 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 73.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics35.3% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive69.5% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Run History
SystemMSI MS-7972
MotherboardMSI Z170M MORTAR (MS-7972)  (all builds)
Memory13.2 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1842 x 1036 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20161214
Uptime0 Days
Run DateOct 21 '18 at 16:42
Run Duration155 Seconds
Run User FIN-User
Background CPU0%
Watch Gameplay: 1050-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (51st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-6600-$115
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz
Performing above expectations (79th percentile)
73.2% Very good
Memory 76.1
1-Core 114
2-Core 201
74% 130 Pts
4-Core 401
8-Core 429
55% 415 Pts
64-Core 450
28% 450 Pts
Poor: 47%
This bench: 73.2%
Great: 77%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59
CLim: 1999 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 416.34
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
35.3% Below average
Lighting 45.8
Reflection 31.5
Parallax 38.3
37% 38.5 fps
MRender 37
Gravity 41.5
Splatting 36.4
31% 38.3 fps
Poor: 27%
This bench: 35.3%
Great: 33%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial BX100 250GB-$141
24GB free (System drive)
Firmware: MU01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 224 157 115 88 100 78 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)
69.5% Good
Read 491
Write 358
Mixed 316
SusWrite 127
72% 323 MB/s
4K Read 29
4K Write 95.6
4K Mixed 11.9
110% 45.5 MB/s
DQ Read 251
DQ Write 248
DQ Mixed 194
161% 231 MB/s
Poor: 59%
This bench: 69.5%
Great: 103%
Kingston A400 480GB-$38
82GB free
Firmware: SBFK61E1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 387 342 102 102 105 105 MB/s
Performing above expectations (69th percentile)
85.7% Excellent
Read 463
Write 198
Mixed 318
SusWrite 190
65% 292 MB/s
4K Read 36.4
4K Write 76.8
4K Mixed 39.2
146% 50.8 MB/s
DQ Read 202
DQ Write 278
DQ Mixed 169
148% 216 MB/s
Poor: 39%
This bench: 85.7%
Great: 102%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB-$25
353GB free
Firmware: CC47
SusWrite @10s intervals: 176 176 173 175 175 176 MB/s
Performing as expected (58th percentile)
94.9% Outstanding
Read 156
Write 122
Mixed 81
SusWrite 175
98% 133 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.9
167% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 55%
This bench: 94.9%
Great: 112%
Seagate Backup+ SL 1TB
464GB free, PID ab20
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 75 74 74 74 74 74 MB/s
Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)
25.6% Poor
Read 19.5
Write 57.5
Mixed 40.5
SusWrite 74.3
73% 48 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 0.8
100% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 25.6%
Great: 46%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston HyperX 2133 C14 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing below potential (3rd percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
39.2% Below average
MC Read 13.7
MC Write 14.2
MC Mixed 12.3
38% 13.4 GB/s
SC Read 9.6
SC Write 12.7
SC Mixed 13.1
34% 11.8 GB/s
Latency 88
45% 88 ns
Poor: 42%
This bench: 39.2%
Great: 80%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Z170M MORTAR (MS-7972) Builds (Compare 371 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 62%
Destroyer
Desktop
Desktop 83%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 49%
Yacht

Motherboard: MSI Z170M MORTAR (MS-7972) - $89

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 69% - Good Total price: $628
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. Because UserBenchmark’s data often contradicts their marketing spiel, they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of money on flagship hardware sales: 4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc. We help consumers get comparable real-world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Additionally, brands spend more on marketing weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated the last 13 years to providing comprehensive and accurate data to our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again and collectively save millions every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback