Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 0% Tree trunk	Desktop 37% Jet ski	Workstation 0% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (45th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 55 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 39.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics	1.75% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory	4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

5 years ago, 5 years ago.

PC Performing as expected (45^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core2 Extreme X9100 2 User benchmarks, average bench 38% uFC-PGA Socket, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads Base clock 3.05 GHz Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	39.2% Below average	Memory 66.5 1-Core 41 2-Core 85.2 41% 64.2 Pts	4-Core 76.2 8-Core 52.1 9% 64.1 Pts	64-Core 65.1 4% 65.1 Pts
Poor: 36% ↑ This bench: 39.2% Great: 39%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GeForce 9600M-GT 3,959 User benchmarks, average bench 2% Toshiba(1179 0001) 512MB Ram: 512MB, Driver: 342.1 Performing above expectations (65^th percentile)	1.75% Terrible	Lighting 2.2 Reflection 4 Parallax 0.78 2% 2.33 fps	MRender 3.81 Gravity 0.9 Splatting 1.7 2% 2.14 fps
Poor: 1% ↑ This bench: 1.75% Great: 2%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Hitachi HTS545050KTSA00 500GB 6 User benchmarks, average bench 25% 148GB free (System drive) Firmware: BKFO SusWrite @10s intervals: 23 38 39 43 50 52 MB/s Performing way below expectations (17^th percentile)	18.8% Very poor	Read 24.5 Write 37.2 Mixed 25 SusWrite 40.9 24% 31.9 MB/s	4K Read 0.3 4K Write 0.8 4K Mixed 0.4 72% 0.5 MB/s
Poor: 19% ↑ This bench: 18.8% Great: 32%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 2x2GB 446,702 User benchmarks, average bench 20% 2 of 2 slots used 4GB SODIMM DDR2 Performing as expected (54^th percentile)	18.3% Very poor	MC Read 6.8 MC Write 5.4 MC Mixed 5.2 17% 5.8 GB/s	SC Read 5.2 SC Write 5.3 SC Mixed 5.3 15% 5.27 GB/s	Latency 110 36% 110 ns
Poor: 10% ↑ This bench: 18.3% Great: 44%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 2%

Tree trunk

Desktop 37%

Jet ski

Workstation 2%

Tree trunk

CPU
Core2 Duo P8600Intel $42Bench 37%, 8,502 samples	1x
Core2 Duo T6400IntelBench 37%, 4 samples	1x
Core2 Duo T9550IntelBench 40%, 23 samples	1x

GPU
GeForce 9600M-GTNvidiaBench 2%, 3,959 samples	4x
GeForce 9700M GTSNvidiaBench 3%, 174 samples	1x

SSD
830 128GBSamsung $109Bench 63%, 37,250 samples	1x
M550 512GBCrucial $283Bench 92%, 5,683 samples	1x
TS256GSSD230S 256GBTranscendBench 89%, 3,887 samples	1x

Value: 21% - Poor

Total price: $151