PC Status | Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (16th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 84 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 63.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average. |
Graphics | 22.6% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Boot Drive | 146% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files. |
Memory | 64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing. |
OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
System | IT P7xxTM1 (all builds) |
Motherboard | IT P7xxTM1 |
Memory | 55 GB free of 64 GB @ 2.7 GHz |
Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors |
OS | Windows 10 |
BIOS Date | 20171020 |
Uptime | 6.1 Days |
Run Date | Oct 17 '18 at 04:09 |
Run Duration | 235 Seconds |
Run User | AUS-User |
Background CPU | 19% |
CPU Throttled | 56% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
63.6%
Good
|
||||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
Nvidia GTX 1060 (Mobile)
Clevo(1558 7510) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1987 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 388.31
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
22.6%
Poor
|
|||
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
Samsung 960 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 512GB-$139
304GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B6QCXP7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 815 825 731 990 835 854 MB/s
|
146%
Outstanding
|
|||
Samsung 960 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$249
141GB free
Firmware: 2B6QCXP7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 814 798 614 732 553 528 MB/s
|
160%
Outstanding
|
|||
Samsung 850 Pro 2TB-$320
1.5TB free
Firmware: EXM03B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 343 372 290 365 347 357 MB/s
|
77.2%
Very good
|
|||
Samsung 850 Evo 1TB-$130
155GB free
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 344 373 291 365 348 358 MB/s
|
86.5%
Excellent
|
|||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
Micron 16ATF2G64HZ-2G6H1 4x16GB
4 of 4 slots used
64GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz
|
79%
Very good
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
Core i7-9700KIntel $265Bench 97%, 550,833 samples | 9x |
Core i9-9900KIntel $403Bench 98%, 354,223 samples | 6x |
Core i7-8700KIntel $193Bench 88%, 746,287 samples | 6x |
GPU | |
---|---|
RTX 2080 (Mobile)NvidiaBench 112%, 4,380 samples | 9x |
GeForce RTX 2060NvidiaBench 68%, 3,498 samples | 4x |
GTX 1060 (Mobile)NvidiaBench 47%, 177,775 samples | 4x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 77% - Very good | Total price: $364 |