Asrock Z270 SuperCarrier

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 56%
Gunboat
Desktop
Desktop 100%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 49%
Yacht
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (62nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 38 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 92.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics51.6% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive224% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (13%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
5 years ago, 5 years ago.
MotherboardAsrock Z270 SuperCarrier  (all builds)
Memory22.6 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.6 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors, 3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180226
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateOct 17 '18 at 03:10
Run Duration181 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 13%
Watch Gameplay: 480 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-7700K-$248
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4.2 GHz, turbo 4.6 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
92.9% Outstanding
Memory 96.3
1-Core 145
2-Core 267
95% 169 Pts
4-Core 482
8-Core 756
76% 619 Pts
64-Core 768
48% 768 Pts
Poor: 71%
This bench: 92.9%
Great: 92%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 480-$75
CLim: 1338 MHz, MLim: 2000 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 18.10.1
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
51.6% Above average
Lighting 63.3
Reflection 60.6
Parallax 83.4
52% 69.1 fps
MRender 69.3
Gravity 65.6
Splatting 56.8
52% 63.9 fps
Poor: 35%
This bench: 51.6%
Great: 53%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung SM961 NVMe PCIe M.2 128GB
31GB free (System drive)
Firmware: CXZ7100Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 404 378 358 291 269 295 MB/s
Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)
224% Outstanding
Read 2360
Write 445
Mixed 434
SusWrite 332
192% 893 MB/s
4K Read 52.2
4K Write 151
4K Mixed 57.7
233% 86.9 MB/s
DQ Read 1,265
DQ Write 488
DQ Mixed 362
403% 705 MB/s
Poor: 133%
This bench: 224%
Great: 273%
Intel Optane+7.2TBHDD
4.5TB free
Firmware: 16.5
SusWrite @10s intervals: 132 134 136 93 13 12 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
Microsoft Storage Space Device 42TB
8.5TB free
Firmware: 0.1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 151 157 155 171 154 164 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
105% Outstanding
Read 208
Write 156
Mixed 93.5
SusWrite 158
113% 154 MB/s
4K Read 1.4
4K Write 2.3
4K Mixed 0.8
190% 1.5 MB/s
Poor: 57%
This bench: 105%
Great: 105%
WD My Book 25EE 8TB
3.5TB free, PID 25ee
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 138 138 136 128 135 140 MB/s
Performing as expected (45th percentile)
63.3% Good
Read 126
Write 142
Mixed 98.7
SusWrite 136
172% 125 MB/s
4K Read 2.2
4K Write 4.9
4K Mixed 1.3
219% 2.8 MB/s
Poor: 20%
This bench: 63.3%
Great: 98%
WD My Book 25EE 8TB
3.5TB free, PID 25ee
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 42 42 42 42 42 42 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (18th percentile)
30.4% Below average
Read 44.3
Write 42
Mixed 40.2
SusWrite 42
57% 42.1 MB/s
4K Read 1.5
4K Write 4.7
4K Mixed 1
199% 2.4 MB/s
Poor: 20%
This bench: 30.4%
Great: 98%
WD My Passport 259F 1TB
510GB free, PID 259f
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 101 101 100 101 100 101 MB/s
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
41.3% Average
Read 88
Write 85.7
Mixed 52.3
SusWrite 101
110% 81.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 0.8
100% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 41.3%
Great: 45%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3600 C17 4x8GB
4 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3600 MHz
Performing below potential (33rd percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
103% Outstanding
MC Read 38.2
MC Write 40.1
MC Mixed 30.4
104% 36.2 GB/s
SC Read 22.2
SC Write 42.9
SC Mixed 33.2
94% 32.8 GB/s
Latency 53
76% 53 ns
Poor: 70%
This bench: 103%
Great: 135%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Z270 SuperCarrier Builds (Compare 82 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 50%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 94%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 43%
Speed boat

Motherboard: Asrock Z270 SuperCarrier

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 96% - Outstanding Total price: $467
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback