Asus X99-E WS/USB 3.1

Performance Results


Gaming 117% UFO	Desktop 88% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 112% UFO


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (56th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 44 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 78.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	145% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	302% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Motherboard	Asus X99-E WS/USB 3.1 (all builds)
Memory	59.8 GB free of 64 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display	2560 x 1600 - 32 Bit colors, 2560 x 1600 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20180301
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Oct 17 '18 at 00:49
Run Duration	271 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	2%

Watch Gameplay: 2080-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing as expected (56^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-5960X-$285 15,468 User benchmarks, average bench 80% SOCKET 2011, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 3.3 GHz (avg) Performing as expected (47^th percentile)	78.2% Very good	Memory 90.3 1-Core 92.8 2-Core 189 72% 124 Pts	4-Core 357 8-Core 692 62% 524 Pts	64-Core 1,038 64% 1,038 Pts
Poor: 70% ↑ This bench: 78.2% Great: 94%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2080-Ti-$441 357,946 User benchmarks, average bench 156% Nvidia(10DE 12A4) ≥ 4GB CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 11GB, Driver: 416.34 Performing below potential (17^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	145% Outstanding	Lighting 192 Reflection 205 Parallax 233 157% 210 fps	MRender 241 Gravity 202 Splatting 140 153% 195 fps
Poor: 128% ↑ This bench: 145% Great: 174%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Nvme Samsung SSD 970 2TB 10,220 User benchmarks, average bench 331% 1.5TB free (System drive) Firmware: 1B2Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 1838 2199 1331 1196 1193 1211 MB/s Performing below expectations (32^nd percentile)	302% Outstanding	Read 2376 Write 2192 Mixed 1,388 SusWrite 1,494 417% 1,863 MB/s	4K Read 53.6 4K Write 162 4K Mixed 75.2 263% 97 MB/s	DQ Read 846 DQ Write 705 DQ Mixed 746 566% 765 MB/s
Poor: 221% ↑ This bench: 302% Great: 431%
Samsung 840 Evo 1TB-$199 23,857 User benchmarks, average bench 105% 301GB free Firmware: EXT0DB6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 405 467 469 471 470 471 MB/s Performing above expectations (67^th percentile)	113% Outstanding	Read 484 Write 159 Mixed 231 SusWrite 459 74% 333 MB/s	4K Read 39 4K Write 94.5 4K Mixed 50.1 173% 61.2 MB/s	DQ Read 379 DQ Write 167 DQ Mixed 207 171% 251 MB/s
Poor: 78% ↑ This bench: 113% Great: 126%
WD Black 1TB (2010)-$49 257,835 User benchmarks, average bench 57% 377GB free Firmware: 05.01D05 SusWrite @10s intervals: 89 92 93 95 94 96 MB/s Performing below expectations (36^th percentile)	52.2% Above average	Read 88.2 Write 86 Mixed 90 SusWrite 93.3 66% 89.4 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 2.1 4K Mixed 0.8 161% 1.23 MB/s
Poor: 35% ↑ This bench: 52.2% Great: 76%
WD Black 1TB (2013)-$40 240,965 User benchmarks, average bench 82% 931GB free Firmware: 01.01A01 SusWrite @10s intervals: 159 159 160 161 161 161 MB/s Performing above expectations (79^th percentile)	96.9% Outstanding	Read 178 Write 153 Mixed 93.5 SusWrite 160 107% 146 MB/s	4K Read 1.3 4K Write 2.8 4K Mixed 1.2 239% 1.77 MB/s
Poor: 50% ↑ This bench: 96.9% Great: 108%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$32 3,105,054 User benchmarks, average bench 83% 927GB free Firmware: 01.01A01 SusWrite @10s intervals: 173 178 177 178 177 178 MB/s Performing way above expectations (87^th percentile)	103% Outstanding	Read 180 Write 179 Mixed 104 SusWrite 177 117% 160 MB/s	4K Read 1.4 4K Write 2.8 4K Mixed 1.2 244% 1.8 MB/s
Poor: 52% ↑ This bench: 103% Great: 109%
WD WD3000GLFS-01F8U0 300GB 3,689 User benchmarks, average bench 58% 128GB free Firmware: 03.03V01 SusWrite @10s intervals: 100 101 100 101 100 98 MB/s Performing above expectations (69^th percentile)	61.9% Good	Read 115 Write 112 Mixed 74.2 SusWrite 100 74% 100 MB/s	4K Read 1 4K Write 2.9 4K Mixed 1.3 240% 1.73 MB/s
Poor: 38% ↑ This bench: 61.9% Great: 68%
WD Elements 107C 5TB 1,675 User benchmarks, average bench 46% 2TB free, PID 107c Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 124 125 122 124 124 121 MB/s Performing above expectations (62^nd percentile)	52.4% Above average	Read 117 Write 124 Mixed 90.5 SusWrite 123 155% 114 MB/s	4K Read 0.9 4K Write 2.7 4K Mixed 0.9 126% 1.5 MB/s
Poor: 16% ↑ This bench: 52.4% Great: 66%
Generic Ultra HS-SD/MMC 1GB 6 User benchmarks, average bench 4% 1GB free, PID 4064 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 3.5 3.8 3.7 3.8 3.7 3.7 MB/s Performing as expected (50^th percentile)	2.82% Terrible	Read 8.5 Write 2.5 Mixed 2.8 SusWrite 3.7 5% 4.38 MB/s	4K Read 3.3 4K Write 0 4K Mixed 0 12% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 2.82% Great: 4%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
G.SKILL Ripjaws 4 DDR4 2400 C15 8x8GB 303 User benchmarks, average bench 115% 8 of 8 slots used 64GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz Performing above expectations (73^rd percentile)	118% Outstanding	MC Read 51.8 MC Write 44 MC Mixed 43.9 133% 46.6 GB/s	SC Read 15.3 SC Write 18.3 SC Mixed 22.3 53% 18.6 GB/s	Latency 66.9 60% 66.9 ns
Poor: 103% ↑ This bench: 118% Great: 131%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical X99-E WS/USB 3.1 Builds (Compare 262 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 102%

UFO

Desktop 83%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 98%

Nuclear submarine

Motherboard: Asus X99-E WS/USB 3.1

CPU
Core i7-5960XIntel $285Bench 80%, 15,468 samples	39x
Core i7-6850KIntel $115Bench 84%, 29,279 samples	28x
Core i7-6900KIntel $120Bench 86%, 6,755 samples	23x

GPU
GTX 1080-TiNvidia $485Bench 124%, 840,268 samples	31x
GTX 1080Nvidia $195Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples	27x
GTX 1070Nvidia $132Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples	21x

SSD
SSDSC2BB150G7 150GBIntelBench 52%, 328 samples	20x
970 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $320Bench 327%, 38,669 samples	11x
850 Evo 500GBSamsung $94Bench 112%, 695,664 samples	10x

RAM
M393A1K43DB2-CWE 8x8GBSamsungBench 146%, 50 samples	6x
SP008GXLZU320BSA 4x8GBSilicon-PowerBench 99%, 50 samples	6x
M393A2G40DB0-CPB 4x16GBSamsungBench 92%, 1,230 samples	5x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 68% - Good

Total price: $770

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254	Nvidia RTX 4060 $289	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $175	Nvidia RTX 4070 $550	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16