MSI B360 GAMING PLUS (MS-7B22)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 48%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 83%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 42%
Speed boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (31st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 69 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 79.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics58.7% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive64.9% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (31%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
5 years ago, 5 years ago.
SystemMicro-Star MS-7B22
MotherboardMSI B360 GAMING PLUS (MS-7B22)  (all builds)
Memory10.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180224
Uptime0 Days
Run DateOct 15 '18 at 01:45
Run Duration111 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 31%
Watch Gameplay: 1060-6GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (31st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-8700K-$190
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 4.3 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
79.9% Very good
Memory 84.1
1-Core 118
2-Core 218
80% 140 Pts
4-Core 421
8-Core 519
61% 470 Pts
64-Core 862
53% 862 Pts
Poor: 76%
This bench: 79.9%
Great: 100%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB-$117
CLim: 2113 MHz, MLim: 2302 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 416.16
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
58.7% Above average
Lighting 71.3
Reflection 76.6
Parallax 66.3
58% 71.4 fps
MRender 78.1
Gravity 69.4
Splatting 72.2
60% 73.3 fps
Poor: 51%
This bench: 58.7%
Great: 60%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WDC WDBNCE2500PNC-WRSN 250GB
129GB free (System drive)
Firmware: X41110WD
SusWrite @10s intervals: 198 182 178 154 161 162 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (15th percentile)
64.9% Good
Read 417
Write 244
Mixed 172
SusWrite 172
56% 251 MB/s
4K Read 17.1
4K Write 55.6
4K Mixed 20.5
82% 31.1 MB/s
DQ Read 360
DQ Write 218
DQ Mixed 202
174% 260 MB/s
Poor: 55%
This bench: 64.9%
Great: 100%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston HX424C15FB/16 1x16GB
1 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
38% Below average
MC Read 12.4
MC Write 16
MC Mixed 12.1
39% 13.5 GB/s
SC Read 7.1
SC Write 8.8
SC Mixed 5.9
21% 7.27 GB/s
Latency 73.4
54% 73.4 ns
Poor: 38%
This bench: 38%
Great: 49%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical B360 GAMING PLUS (MS-7B22) Builds (Compare 4,299 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 53%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 88%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 45%
Speed boat

Motherboard: MSI B360 GAMING PLUS (MS-7B22) - $108

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 90% - Outstanding Total price: $464
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $50
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback