Asrock N68-GS4 FX

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 58%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (63rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 37 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 62.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics3.3% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive26% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
5 years ago, 5 years ago.
MotherboardAsrock N68-GS4 FX  (all builds)
Memory6.2 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.1 GHz
Display1440 x 900 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20150408
Uptime0 Days
Run DateOct 14 '18 at 17:01
Run Duration157 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD FX-8370E-$471
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.65 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (77th percentile)
62.3% Good
Memory 84.6
1-Core 75.6
2-Core 138
61% 99.4 Pts
4-Core 218
8-Core 358
35% 288 Pts
64-Core 358
22% 358 Pts
Poor: 53%
This bench: 62.3%
Great: 66%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 720
PNY(196E 1130) 1GB
CLim: 797 MHz, MLim: 400 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 399.24
Performing way below expectations (16th percentile)
3.3% Terrible
Lighting 3.93
Reflection 3.62
Parallax 3.62
3% 3.72 fps
MRender 4.05
Gravity 3.27
Splatting 5.09
4% 4.13 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 3.3%
Great: 6%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Dc-154 Mirror Set 0 256GB
176GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2.04
SusWrite @10s intervals: 42 42 41 43 43 43 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
26% Poor
Read 77.8
Write 41.6
Mixed 52.7
SusWrite 42.1
12% 53.6 MB/s
4K Read 15.7
4K Write 24.8
4K Mixed 18.1
60% 19.5 MB/s
DQ Read 33.7
DQ Write 34.9
DQ Mixed 30.1
24% 32.9 MB/s
Poor: 25%
This bench: 26%
Great: 26%
Nvidia STRIPE 1.36T 1.5TB
1.5TB free
SusWrite @10s intervals: 195 207 204 210 212 210 MB/s
Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
112% Outstanding
Read 185
Write 201
Mixed 96.8
SusWrite 206
126% 172 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 3.1
4K Mixed 1.3
244% 1.8 MB/s
Poor: 45%
This bench: 112%
Great: 127%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMT351U7BFR8C-H9 Nanya M2F4G64CB8HG5N-CG 8GB
1066, 1066 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
39.7% Below average
MC Read 14.5
MC Write 13.2
MC Mixed 13.4
39% 13.7 GB/s
SC Read 9.6
SC Write 8.8
SC Mixed 11.4
28% 9.93 GB/s
Latency 72.5
55% 72.5 ns
Poor: 27%
This bench: 39.7%
Great: 46%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical N68-GS4 FX Builds (Compare 93 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 12%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 62%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 10%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asrock N68-GS4 FX

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 54% - Above average Total price: $210
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $109Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $245Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback