Dell System XPS L702X

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (69th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 31 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 64.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics5.29% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive67.3% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Run History
5 years ago, 5 years ago.
SystemDell System XPS L702X  (all builds)
MotherboardDell 0XN71K
Memory9.7 GB free of 12 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20120907
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateOct 14 '18 at 08:43
Run Duration139 Seconds
Run User GRC-User
Background CPU10%

 PC Performing above expectations (69th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-2670QM-$200
CPU, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.2 GHz
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
64.5% Good
Memory 81.9
1-Core 78.5
2-Core 152
62% 104 Pts
4-Core 256
8-Core 377
39% 316 Pts
64-Core 377
23% 377 Pts
Poor: 31%
This bench: 64.5%
Great: 67%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 555M
Dell(1028 0571) 3GB
Driver: nvd3dumx.dll Ver. 23.21.13.9135
Performing way above expectations (85th percentile)
5.29% Terrible
Lighting 5.63
Reflection 7.08
Parallax 1.81
5% 4.84 fps
MRender 8.67
Gravity 6.47
Splatting 8.96
7% 8.03 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 5.29%
Great: 5%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston HyperX 3K 240GB-$70
147GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 506A
SusWrite @10s intervals: 231 213 212 214 199 153 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)
67.3% Good
Read 358
Write 247
Mixed 273
SusWrite 204
60% 270 MB/s
4K Read 23.6
4K Write 50.7
4K Mixed 26.4
96% 33.6 MB/s
DQ Read 276
DQ Write 214
DQ Mixed 24
78% 171 MB/s
Poor: 59%
This bench: 67.3%
Great: 94%
HGST Travelstar 7K1000 2.5" 1TB
533GB free
Firmware: JB0O
SusWrite @10s intervals: 115 117 118 116 119 118 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
71.8% Very good
Read 134
Write 110
Mixed 22.2
SusWrite 117
69% 95.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 0.7
4K Mixed 0.4
82% 0.57 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 71.8%
Great: 75%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 9905428-093.A00LF Samsung M471B5273DH0-CH9 12GB
1333, 1333 MHz
8192, 4096 MB
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
38.5% Below average
MC Read 15.3
MC Write 14.6
MC Mixed 13.2
41% 14.4 GB/s
SC Read 0.3
SC Write 13.6
SC Mixed 0.6
14% 4.83 GB/s
Latency 77.2
52% 77.2 ns
Poor: 14%
This bench: 38.5%
Great: 51%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical System XPS L702X Builds (Compare 619 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 53%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

System: Dell System XPS L702X

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 52% - Above average Total price: $276
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing charade so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit a lot from flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they've no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products, which UserBenchmark reveals.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. The 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we've dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data which saves our users millions every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $176Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback