MSI Z270 KRAIT GAMING (MS-7A59)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 129%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 101%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 112%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (77th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 23 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 94.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics134% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive336% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemMSI MS-7A59
MotherboardMSI Z270 KRAIT GAMING (MS-7A59)  (all builds)
Memory10.8 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180130
Uptime0.4 Days
Run DateOct 13 '18 at 10:23
Run Duration237 Seconds
Run User AUS-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing above expectations (77th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-7700K-$249
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4.2 GHz, turbo 4.5 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
94.1% Outstanding
Memory 98.3
1-Core 143
2-Core 245
93% 162 Pts
4-Core 484
8-Core 781
78% 633 Pts
64-Core 786
49% 786 Pts
Poor: 71%
This bench: 94.1%
Great: 92%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-Ti-$485
Zotac(19DA 4471) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2037 MHz, MLim: 2800 MHz, Ram: 11GB, Driver: 391.1
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
134% Outstanding
Lighting 188
Reflection 202
Parallax 186
153% 192 fps
MRender 130
Gravity 189
Splatting 135
123% 151 fps
Poor: 109%
This bench: 134%
Great: 133%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 960 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 512GB-$139
373GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B6QCXP7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1541 1713 1751 1737 1769 1712 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
336% Outstanding
Read 2,319
Write 1,863
Mixed 900
SusWrite 1,704
379% 1,696 MB/s
4K Read 52.4
4K Write 165
4K Mixed 73.6
261% 97 MB/s
DQ Read 1,314
DQ Write 1,319
DQ Mixed 1,137
904% 1,257 MB/s
Poor: 159%
This bench: 336%
Great: 353%
Crucial MX500 1TB-$88
662GB free
Firmware: M3CR010
SusWrite @10s intervals: 424 456 465 447 428 427 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
128% Outstanding
Read 516
Write 455
Mixed 426
SusWrite 441
103% 460 MB/s
4K Read 40.9
4K Write 129
4K Mixed 60.5
208% 76.8 MB/s
DQ Read 387
DQ Write 344
DQ Mixed 307
246% 346 MB/s
Poor: 75%
This bench: 128%
Great: 125%
Kingston A400 120GB-$26
111GB free
Firmware: SBFK11B1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 292 73 72 70 73 73 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
87.8% Excellent
Read 497
Write 444
Mixed 352
SusWrite 109
78% 350 MB/s
4K Read 38
4K Write 104
4K Mixed 34.7
157% 59 MB/s
DQ Read 309
DQ Write 327
DQ Mixed 190
178% 275 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 87.8%
Great: 85%
WD Elements 25A1 4TB
3.5TB free, PID 25a1
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 37 37 38 37 38 38 MB/s
Performing below expectations (24th percentile)
33% Below average
Read 33.5
Write 34
Mixed 22.8
SusWrite 37.4
43% 31.9 MB/s
4K Read 1.2
4K Write 6.4
4K Mixed 0.9
253% 2.83 MB/s
Poor: 20%
This bench: 33%
Great: 61%
BUFFALO HD-PNTU3 1TB
208GB free, PID 01e7
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 42 42 43 40 43 43 MB/s
Performing below expectations (27th percentile)
19.8% Very poor
Read 40.7
Write 41.5
Mixed 28.5
SusWrite 42.1
52% 38.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.5
70% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 19.8%
Great: 43%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL F4 DDR4 3200 C14 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing above expectations (79th percentile)
104% Outstanding
MC Read 40.4
MC Write 39.2
MC Mixed 29.7
104% 36.4 GB/s
SC Read 23.6
SC Write 41.1
SC Mixed 32.7
93% 32.5 GB/s
Latency 44.7
90% 44.7 ns
Poor: 61%
This bench: 104%
Great: 122%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Z270 KRAIT GAMING (MS-7A59) Builds (Compare 715 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 89%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 90%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 76%
Battleship

Motherboard: MSI Z270 KRAIT GAMING (MS-7A59) - $146

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 91% - Outstanding Total price: $738
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback