Performance Results


Gaming 39% Jet ski	Desktop 99% Nuclear submarine	Workstation 36% Jet ski


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (66th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 34 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 98.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics	32.7% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	208% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (12%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing above expectations (66^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-8700-$200 349,567 User benchmarks, average bench 87% LGA1151, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 4.3 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	98.1% Outstanding	Memory 95.2 1-Core 136 2-Core 274 94% 168 Pts	4-Core 543 8-Core 875 87% 709 Pts	64-Core 1,119 69% 1,119 Pts
Poor: 75% ↑ This bench: 98.1% Great: 94%

Graphics Cards	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10
Nvidia GeForce GT 630 60,212 User benchmarks, average bench 4% Gigabyte(1458 3543) 1GB CLim: 810 MHz, MLim: 400 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 388.13 Performing above expectations (75^th percentile)	3.93% Terrible	Lighting 4.87 Reflection 5.62 Parallax 4.06 4% 4.85 fps	MRender 6.38 Gravity 4.87 Splatting 3.52 4% 4.92 fps
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 3.93% Great: 5%
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59 946,701 User benchmarks, average bench 29% Asus(1043 8603) ≥ 4GB CLim: 1961 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 388.13 Performing way above expectations (96^th percentile)	32.7% Below average	Lighting 41.1 Reflection 31.6 Parallax 38.8 34% 37.2 fps	MRender 38.4 Gravity 39.7 Splatting 36.9 31% 38.3 fps
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 32.7% Great: 33%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 250GB-$45 240,629 User benchmarks, average bench 199% 195GB free (System drive) Firmware: 3B7QCXE7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 1328 307 308 309 309 308 MB/s Performing above expectations (61^st percentile)	208% Outstanding	Read 1,902 Write 1,432 Mixed 583 SusWrite 478 243% 1,099 MB/s	4K Read 41.3 4K Write 126 4K Mixed 50.8 194% 72.6 MB/s	DQ Read 1059 DQ Write 914 DQ Mixed 700 603% 891 MB/s
Poor: 142% ↑ This bench: 208% Great: 236%
PNY CS1311 240GB-$78 26,547 User benchmarks, average bench 81% 134GB free Firmware: CS131122 SusWrite @10s intervals: 171 173 173 172 173 172 MB/s Performing below potential (18^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	67.2% Good	Read 206 Write 176 Mixed 192 SusWrite 172 42% 187 MB/s	4K Read 23.3 4K Write 97 4K Mixed 29.5 124% 49.9 MB/s	DQ Read 307 DQ Write 176 DQ Mixed 123 124% 202 MB/s
Poor: 52% ↑ This bench: 67.2% Great: 97%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 3TB-$40 235,501 User benchmarks, average bench 88% 553GB free Firmware: CC27 SusWrite @10s intervals: 145 145 145 145 146 144 MB/s Performing below expectations (38^th percentile)	83.9% Excellent	Read 148 Write 135 Mixed 83.5 SusWrite 145 94% 128 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1.7 4K Mixed 0.8 150% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 56% ↑ This bench: 83.9% Great: 113%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 2400 C14 2x8GB 16,624 User benchmarks, average bench 73% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2460 MHz Performing above expectations (76^th percentile)	77.6% Very good	MC Read 30.1 MC Write 28.5 MC Mixed 21.9 77% 26.8 GB/s	SC Read 18.7 SC Write 30.5 SC Mixed 25.5 71% 24.9 GB/s	Latency 56.5 71% 56.5 ns
Poor: 49% ↑ This bench: 77.6% Great: 89%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 110%

UFO

Desktop 91%

Nuclear submarine

Workstation 100%

UFO

SSD
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $80Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	536x
970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung $43Bench 273%, 381,216 samples	489x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $95Bench 310%, 455,997 samples	404x

RAM
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GBCorsair $43Bench 82%, 606,405 samples	842x
Trident Z RGB DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBG.SKILL $55Bench 84%, 215,644 samples	314x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 4x8GBCorsairBench 87%, 76,101 samples	306x

Value: 71% - Very good

Total price: $926

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16