Gigabyte GA-Z77X-D3H

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 10%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 71%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 9%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (49th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 51 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 71.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics7.36% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive55.9% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
MotherboardGigabyte GA-Z77X-D3H  (all builds)
Memory26.5 GB free of 32 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20140106
Uptime0.6 Days
Run DateOct 11 '18 at 23:15
Run Duration239 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing as expected (49th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-3770-$297
Intel(R) Core(TM) i7-3770 CPU @ 3.40GHz, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.9 GHz
Performing above expectations (71st percentile)
71.4% Very good
Memory 90.9
1-Core 104
2-Core 196
76% 130 Pts
4-Core 281
8-Core 407
43% 344 Pts
64-Core 379
23% 379 Pts
Poor: 57%
This bench: 71.4%
Great: 76%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 640
EVGA(3842 2645) 2GB
CLim: 901 MHz, MLim: 445 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 398.82
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
7.36% Terrible
Lighting 8.5
Reflection 7.81
Parallax 9.12
7% 8.48 fps
MRender 8.81
Gravity 10.1
Splatting 10.7
8% 9.88 fps
Poor: 5%
This bench: 7.36%
Great: 7%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 840 250GB-$251
57GB free (System drive)
Firmware: DXT0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 90 65 62 58 47 48 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (16th percentile)
55.9% Above average
Read 385
Write 142
Mixed 144
SusWrite 61.6
40% 183 MB/s
4K Read 24.6
4K Write 41.5
4K Mixed 21.1
86% 29.1 MB/s
DQ Read 363
DQ Write 115
DQ Mixed 57.5
90% 179 MB/s
Poor: 51%
This bench: 55.9%
Great: 85%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 2TB-$37
469GB free
Firmware: CC24
SusWrite @10s intervals: 128 123 115 111 101 98 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (15th percentile)
66.9% Good
Read 121
Write 125
Mixed 71.9
SusWrite 113
79% 108 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1.1
4K Mixed 0.5
93% 0.67 MB/s
Poor: 51%
This bench: 66.9%
Great: 114%
WD Green 2TB (2012)-$50
185GB free
Firmware: 80.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 129 134 134 127 124 129 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
81.7% Excellent
Read 155
Write 144
Mixed 68.4
SusWrite 130
91% 124 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 2.6
4K Mixed 1
197% 1.5 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 81.7%
Great: 84%
WD Green 2TB (2012)-$50
196GB free
Firmware: 80.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 90 92 91 89 88 89 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
44.7% Average
Read 65.2
Write 61.5
Mixed 49.3
SusWrite 89.9
49% 66.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2.3
4K Mixed 0.9
176% 1.33 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 44.7%
Great: 84%
ASMT 2105 3TB
2.5TB free, PID 1053
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 157 156 156 153 155 155 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
63.9% Good
Read 157
Write 165
Mixed 89.5
SusWrite 156
191% 142 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2.3
4K Mixed 0.7
105% 1.27 MB/s
Poor: 16%
This bench: 63.9%
Great: 64%
ASMedia USB 3.0 Device 4TB
534GB free, PID 55aa
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 96 97 98 96 97 99 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)
30.9% Below average
Read 49.2
Write 70.9
Mixed 18
SusWrite 97.1
83% 58.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 0.8
4K Mixed 0.4
42% 0.53 MB/s
Poor: 22%
This bench: 30.9%
Great: 70%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 99U5471-040.A00LF 4x8GB
4 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz
Performing as expected (44th percentile)
48.1% Average
MC Read 17.7
MC Write 17.1
MC Mixed 15.3
48% 16.7 GB/s
SC Read 9.8
SC Write 15
SC Mixed 12.7
36% 12.5 GB/s
Latency 65.9
61% 65.9 ns
Poor: 42%
This bench: 48.1%
Great: 53%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-Z77X-D3H Builds (Compare 1,659 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 41%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 77%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 32%
Sail boat

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-Z77X-D3H - $333

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 86% - Excellent Total price: $575
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark challenges their narrative so they attack our reputation with a co-ordinated charade.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of profit on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, UserBenchmark's data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar PC brands, we've dedicated 13 years to publishing real-world data which collectively saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $37
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback