Performance Results


Gaming 19% Surfboard	Desktop 67% Battle cruiser	Workstation 15% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (53rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 47 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 57.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics	28.4% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	40.7% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (14%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Motherboard	Asus SABERTOOTH 990FX R2.0 (all builds)
Memory	4 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20140408
Uptime	0.1 Days
Run Date	Oct 10 '18 at 15:49
Run Duration	154 Seconds
Run User	BGR-User
Background CPU	14%

PC Performing as expected (53^rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD FX-6300-$90 261,607 User benchmarks, average bench 55% Socket 942, 1 CPU, 3 cores, 6 threads Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.6 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (77^th percentile)	57.7% Above average	Memory 84.4 1-Core 65.8 2-Core 120 57% 90.1 Pts	4-Core 170 8-Core 252 26% 211 Pts	64-Core 251 16% 251 Pts
Poor: 44% ↑ This bench: 57.7% Great: 62%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 760-$209 161,132 User benchmarks, average bench 26% Asus(1043 847A) 2GB CLim: 1228 MHz, MLim: 1502 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 398.11 Performing way above expectations (96^th percentile)	28.4% Poor	Lighting 33.4 Reflection 30.1 Parallax 38 27% 33.8 fps	MRender 41.7 Gravity 39.3 Splatting 33.7 31% 38.2 fps
Poor: 24% ↑ This bench: 28.4% Great: 28%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Ccboot iSCSI 240GB 2 User benchmarks, average bench 76% 47GB free (System drive) Firmware: 0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 70 59 64 68 68 69 MB/s Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	40.7% Average	Read 279 Write 214 Mixed 222 SusWrite 66.4 44% 195 MB/s	4K Read 18.6 4K Write 34.2 4K Mixed 23 76% 25.3 MB/s	DQ Read 25.4 DQ Write 52.1 DQ Mixed 30.7 26% 36.1 MB/s
Poor: 72% ↑ This bench: 40.7% Great: 80%
Ccboot iSCSI 16TB 2 User benchmarks, average bench 36% 7TB free Firmware: 0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 75 64 67 72 71 71 MB/s Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	43.6% Average	Read 305 Write 230 Mixed 224 SusWrite 70 46% 207 MB/s	4K Read 21.5 4K Write 37.4 4K Mixed 23.3 82% 27.4 MB/s	DQ Read 22.6 DQ Write 52.1 DQ Mixed 28.2 24% 34.3 MB/s
Poor: 28% ↑ This bench: 43.6% Great: 44%
Kingston SSDNow V300 240GB-$35 176,713 User benchmarks, average bench 64% 148GB free Firmware: 505CUA SusWrite @10s intervals: 84 73 71 76 76 79 MB/s Performing below expectations (37^th percentile)	60.5% Good	Read 371 Write 262 Mixed 269 SusWrite 76.3 54% 245 MB/s	4K Read 27.1 4K Write 56.1 4K Mixed 25.7 104% 36.3 MB/s	DQ Read 207 DQ Write 218 DQ Mixed 143 127% 189 MB/s
Poor: 41% ↑ This bench: 60.5% Great: 85%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
G.SKILL Ares DDR3 1866 C9 2x4GB 1,522 User benchmarks, average bench 54% 2 of 4 slots used 8GB DIMM DDR3 1600 MHz clocked @ 800 MHz Performing below potential (3^rd percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	29.1% Poor	MC Read 10 MC Write 9.6 MC Mixed 8.5 27% 9.37 GB/s	SC Read 8.2 SC Write 7.7 SC Mixed 8.4 23% 8.1 GB/s	Latency 72.8 55% 72.8 ns
Poor: 32% ↑ This bench: 29.1% Great: 71%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 34%

Sail boat

Desktop 69%

Battle cruiser

Workstation 28%

Raft

RAM
Fury DDR3 1866 C10 2x8GBHyperXBench 59%, 122,541 samples	85x
HyperX DDR3 1866 C10 4x8GBKingstonBench 63%, 12,722 samples	45x
Fury DDR3 1600 C10 2x8GBHyperXBench 54%, 77,652 samples	29x

Value: 53% - Above average

Total price: $630

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16