PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (23rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 77 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
Processor | With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 80.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good. |
Graphics | 46.6% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Boot Drive | 17.8% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD. |
Memory | 32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing. |
OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
Motherboard | Gigabyte GA-AX370-Gaming K7 (all builds) |
Memory | 29.2 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.2 GHz |
Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors |
OS | Windows 10 |
BIOS Date | 20180808 |
Uptime | 0 Days |
Run Date | Oct 10 '18 at 09:47 |
Run Duration | 199 Seconds |
Run User | IND-User |
Background CPU | 7% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
80.7%
Excellent
|
||||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB-$117
Gigabyte(1458 3777) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2050 MHz, MLim: 2079 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 416.16
Performing below potential (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
46.6%
Average
|
|||
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$94
281GB free
Firmware: EMT03B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 15 23 30 26 26 25 MB/s
|
12.1%
Very poor
|
|||
Samsung 960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 250GB-$45
44GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 3B7Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 21 31 43 35 37 33 MB/s
|
17.8%
Very poor
|
|||
Seagate FireCuda SSHD 2TB (2016)-$106
934GB free
Firmware: CC41
SusWrite @10s intervals: 17 23 31 25 26 25 MB/s
|
32.6%
Below average
|
|||
Seagate FireCuda SSHD 2TB (2016)-$106
927GB free
Firmware: CC41
SusWrite @10s intervals: 16 24 29 25 26 24 MB/s
|
32.2%
Below average
|
|||
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$32
230GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 19 24 31 24 26 24 MB/s
|
27.1%
Poor
|
|||
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 2TB-$38
544GB free
Firmware: CC44
SusWrite @10s intervals: 19 24 31 27 29 25 MB/s
|
39.8%
Below average
|
|||
Seagate Barracuda 7200.12 1TB-$70
371GB free
Firmware: JC4B
SusWrite @10s intervals: 17 24 31 26 26 25 MB/s
|
28.5%
Poor
|
|||
Hitachi HTS545050A7E380 500GB
243GB free
Firmware: GG2OAC90
SusWrite @10s intervals: 20 20 27 25 25 23 MB/s
|
19.3%
Very poor
|
|||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
G.SKILL F4 DDR4 3200 C15 2x16GB
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
|
110%
Outstanding
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
Ryzen 7 1800XAMD $235Bench 72%, 30,050 samples | 97x |
Ryzen 7 1700XAMD $211Bench 71%, 66,470 samples | 69x |
Ryzen 7 1700AMD $195Bench 69%, 144,475 samples | 59x |
GPU | |
---|---|
GTX 1080Nvidia $195Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples | 67x |
GTX 1080-TiNvidia $485Bench 124%, 840,268 samples | 58x |
GTX 1070Nvidia $132Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples | 29x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 88% - Excellent | Total price: $826 |