Gigabyte GA-F2A78M-D3H

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 12%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 65%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 10%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (64th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 36 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 59.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics14.7% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive75.8% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (28%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardGigabyte GA-F2A78M-D3H  (all builds)
Memory5.5 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20150507
Uptime0 Days
Run DateOct 10 '18 at 09:18
Run Duration128 Seconds
Run User SVN-User
Background CPU 28%

 PC Performing above expectations (64th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD A8-5600K APU-$250
P0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 3.95 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
59.9% Above average
Memory 83.4
1-Core 68.9
2-Core 124
58% 92.2 Pts
4-Core 213
8-Core 212
28% 213 Pts
64-Core 202
12% 202 Pts
Poor: 34%
This bench: 59.9%
Great: 59%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 470-$126
CLim: 1200 MHz, MLim: 1380 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 17.7
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
14.7% Very poor
Lighting 0.07
Reflection 61
Parallax 71
0% 44 fps
MRender 55.5
Gravity 53.3
Splatting 50.2
43% 53 fps
Poor: 32%
This bench: 14.7%
Great: 47%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Blue 250GB-$86
87GB free (System drive)
Firmware: X41100WD
SusWrite @10s intervals: 211 193 194 191 184 157 MB/s
Performing as expected (41st percentile)
75.8% Very good
Read 450
Write 273
Mixed 296
SusWrite 188
67% 302 MB/s
4K Read 26.3
4K Write 61.3
4K Mixed 33.2
115% 40.3 MB/s
DQ Read 245
DQ Write 233
DQ Mixed 219
170% 233 MB/s
Poor: 59%
This bench: 75.8%
Great: 100%
Hitachi HDS721010DLE630 1TB-$150
777GB free
Firmware: MS2OA610
SusWrite @10s intervals: 183 182 185 185 190 185 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
105% Outstanding
Read 183
Write 178
Mixed 35.7
SusWrite 185
105% 145 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.5
122% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 105%
Great: 99%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown TMS4GB364E081 2x4GB
2 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz
Performing below potential (16th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
35.7% Below average
MC Read 16.6
MC Write 7
MC Mixed 12.2
34% 11.9 GB/s
SC Read 9.7
SC Write 8.3
SC Mixed 12
29% 10 GB/s
Latency 74.5
54% 74.5 ns
Poor: 36%
This bench: 35.7%
Great: 47%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-F2A78M-D3H Builds (Compare 127 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 51%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-F2A78M-D3H

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 51% - Above average Total price: $124
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $245Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback