Gigabyte GA-F2A78M-D3H

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 12%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 64%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 10%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (63rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 37 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 58.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics14.6% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive76% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardGigabyte GA-F2A78M-D3H  (all builds)
Memory4.9 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20150507
Uptime1.5 Days
Run DateOct 08 '18 at 15:13
Run Duration128 Seconds
Run User SVN-User
Background CPU7%

 PC Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD A8-5600K APU-$250
P0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 3.95 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
58.7% Above average
Memory 83.5
1-Core 68.6
2-Core 124
58% 92.2 Pts
4-Core 196
8-Core 211
27% 204 Pts
64-Core 197
12% 197 Pts
Poor: 34%
This bench: 58.7%
Great: 59%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 470-$126
CLim: 1200 MHz, MLim: 1380 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 17.7
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
14.6% Very poor
Lighting 0.03
Reflection 61
Parallax 70.8
0% 44 fps
MRender 55.4
Gravity 53.1
Splatting 49.9
43% 52.8 fps
Poor: 32%
This bench: 14.6%
Great: 47%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Blue 250GB-$86
88GB free (System drive)
Firmware: X41100WD
SusWrite @10s intervals: 208 194 185 182 179 151 MB/s
Performing as expected (41st percentile)
76% Very good
Read 454
Write 391
Mixed 228
SusWrite 183
70% 314 MB/s
4K Read 26.1
4K Write 60.3
4K Mixed 33
114% 39.8 MB/s
DQ Read 278
DQ Write 232
DQ Mixed 212
170% 240 MB/s
Poor: 59%
This bench: 76%
Great: 100%
Hitachi HDS721010DLE630 1TB-$150
777GB free
Firmware: MS2OA610
SusWrite @10s intervals: 179 180 180 183 177 178 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
103% Outstanding
Read 181
Write 169
Mixed 34.3
SusWrite 179
102% 141 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.4
101% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 103%
Great: 99%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown TMS4GB364E081 2x4GB
2 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz
Performing below potential (16th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
35.8% Below average
MC Read 17.1
MC Write 7
MC Mixed 12.2
35% 12.1 GB/s
SC Read 9.1
SC Write 8.3
SC Mixed 11.2
27% 9.53 GB/s
Latency 74.3
54% 74.3 ns
Poor: 36%
This bench: 35.8%
Great: 47%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-F2A78M-D3H Builds (Compare 127 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 51%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-F2A78M-D3H

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 51% - Above average Total price: $124
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $245Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback