ADD TO PC
BUILD

Sony VPCEG2DFX

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 3% Tree trunk	Desktop 48% Yacht	Workstation 3% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (78th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 22 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 54%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics	1.51% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

System	Sony VPCEG2DFX (all builds)
Motherboard	Sony VAIO
Memory	5.7 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	1366 x 768 - 32 Bit couleurs
OS	Windows 7
BIOS Date	20120106
Uptime	0.4 Days
Run Date	Oct 09 '18 at 13:14
Run Duration	131 Seconds
Run User	DZA-User
Background CPU	0%

PC Performing above expectations (78^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i3-2330M-$150 20,066 User benchmarks, average bench 47% N/A, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2.2 GHz Performing way above expectations (92^nd percentile)	54% Above average	Memory 83.3 1-Core 57.7 2-Core 101 52% 80.6 Pts	4-Core 147 8-Core 143 20% 145 Pts	64-Core 134 8% 134 Pts
Poor: 30% ↑ This bench: 54% Great: 55%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel HD 3000 (Mobile V1 1.1/1.2 GHz) 209,058 User benchmarks, average bench 2% Sony(104D 908A) 3.8GB Driver: igdumd64.dll Ver. 8.15.10.2291 Performing above expectations (69^th percentile)	1.51% Terrible	Lighting 1.57 Reflection 2.5 Parallax 0.09 1% 1.39 fps	MRender 2.71 Gravity 0.93 Splatting 3.22 2% 2.29 fps
Poor: 1% ↑ This bench: 1.51% Great: 2%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Toshiba MQ01ABD050 500GB-$23 40,922 User benchmarks, average bench 46% 286GB free (System drive) Firmware: AX00 SusWrite @10s intervals: 85 91 92 87 86 94 MB/s Performing above expectations (62^nd percentile)	50.2% Above average	Read 85.9 Write 90.8 Mixed 32 SusWrite 88.9 54% 74.4 MB/s	4K Read 0.4 4K Write 1.7 4K Mixed 0.7 126% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 23% ↑ This bench: 50.2% Great: 62%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M471B5273DH0-CH9 HMT351S6EFR8A-PB 8GB 10 User benchmarks, average bench 41% 1333, 1333 MHz 4096, 4096 MB Performing way above expectations (90^th percentile)	49.8% Average	MC Read 17.9 MC Write 18.5 MC Mixed 16.7 51% 17.7 GB/s	SC Read 12.7 SC Write 11.6 SC Mixed 13.2 36% 12.5 GB/s	Latency 74.7 54% 74.7 ns
Poor: 13% ↑ This bench: 49.8% Great: 50%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?

Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.

Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?

Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.

Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?

We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.

Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?

The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.

Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?

Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.

The Best

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $110	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249	Nvidia RTX 4070 $549	Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369

Today's hottest

Amazon Ebay

deals

CPU GPU SSD HDD USB RAM MBD

If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission

Build

Test

EFps

Can You Run It?

►
YouTube
*NEW*

About • User Guide • FAQs • Email • Privacy • Developer • YouTube Feedback