Gigabyte X470 AORUS GAMING 5 WIFI

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 56%
Gunboat
Desktop
Desktop 88%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 58%
Gunboat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (65th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 35 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 85.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics58.9% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive72.6% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
5 years ago, 5 years ago.
SystemGigabyte X470 AORUS GAMING 5 WIFI
MotherboardGigabyte X470 AORUS GAMING 5 WIFI  (all builds)
Memory12.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180222
Uptime25.2 Days
Run DateOct 09 '18 at 05:18
Run Duration190 Seconds
Run User NZL-User
Background CPU1%
Watch Gameplay: 580 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (65th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 2700X-$190
AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 3.6 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
85.8% Excellent
Memory 78.7
1-Core 130
2-Core 257
85% 155 Pts
4-Core 497
8-Core 983
87% 740 Pts
64-Core 1,344
83% 1,344 Pts
Poor: 61%
This bench: 85.8%
Great: 89%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 580-$130
Asus(1043 0519) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1411 MHz, MLim: 2000 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 18.8.2
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
58.9% Above average
Lighting 75.2
Reflection 72.4
Parallax 92.5
61% 80 fps
MRender 72.1
Gravity 71.9
Splatting 58.7
54% 67.6 fps
Poor: 46%
This bench: 58.9%
Great: 56%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial MX200 500GB-$90
71GB free (System drive)
Firmware: MU02
SusWrite @10s intervals: 252 214 212 219 184 217 MB/s
Performing below expectations (27th percentile)
72.6% Very good
Read 399
Write 323
Mixed 303
SusWrite 216
70% 310 MB/s
4K Read 22.9
4K Write 80.3
4K Mixed 30.6
116% 44.6 MB/s
DQ Read 143
DQ Write 201
DQ Mixed 135
112% 160 MB/s
Poor: 56%
This bench: 72.6%
Great: 105%
Seagate ST3250312AS 250GB-$59
56GB free
Firmware: HP61
SusWrite @10s intervals: 111 113 112 114 114 114 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (85th percentile)
64.5% Good
Read 112
Write 32
Mixed 63.7
SusWrite 113
59% 80.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.9
162% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 64.5%
Great: 69%
Seagate ST3250312AS 250GB-$59
56GB free
Firmware: HP61
SusWrite @10s intervals: 100 100 101 100 101 102 MB/s
Performing above expectations (68th percentile)
57.6% Above average
Read 100
Write 30.3
Mixed 61.5
SusWrite 101
54% 73.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.9
156% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 57.6%
Great: 69%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.12 1TB-$70
162GB free
Firmware: CC38
SusWrite @10s intervals: 85 86 85 85 86 87 MB/s
Performing below expectations (37th percentile)
50.8% Above average
Read 91.5
Write 82.3
Mixed 62.2
SusWrite 85.5
59% 80.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 1
174% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 34%
This bench: 50.8%
Great: 68%
Seagate ST3250312AS 250GB-$59
54GB free
Firmware: HP61
SusWrite @10s intervals: 99 98 99 99 100 100 MB/s
Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)
55.8% Above average
Read 95
Write 30.5
Mixed 57.5
SusWrite 99.3
52% 70.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 1
176% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 55.8%
Great: 69%
HDD 250GB
93GB free, PID 2551
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 91 92 90 90 91 92 MB/s
Performing above expectations (69th percentile)
41.1% Average
Read 107
Write 62
Mixed 66.2
SusWrite 91
106% 81.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 1
98% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 41.1%
Great: 134%
HDD 500GB
164GB free, PID 2551
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 91 92 90 90 91 91 MB/s
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
46.7% Average
Read 127
Write 127
Mixed 81
SusWrite 90.7
141% 106 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2.7
4K Mixed 1.1
132% 1.53 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 46.7%
Great: 63%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL Flare X DDR4 3200 C14 2x8GB-$73
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing below potential (35th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
88.4% Excellent
MC Read 34.1
MC Write 32.9
MC Mixed 28.7
91% 31.9 GB/s
SC Read 23.1
SC Write 32.3
SC Mixed 25.8
77% 27.1 GB/s
Latency 83
48% 83 ns
Poor: 71%
This bench: 88.4%
Great: 129%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-X470 AORUS GAMING 5 WIFI-CF Builds (Compare 865 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 83%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 85%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 81%
Aircraft carrier

Motherboard: Gigabyte X470 AORUS GAMING 5 WIFI - $475

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 102% - Outstanding Total price: $994
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $48
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback