MSI MS-179C

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 60%
Destroyer
Desktop
Desktop 81%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 52%
Yacht
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (65th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 35 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 73.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics76.1% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive109% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemMicro-Star GE72MVR 7RG
MotherboardMSI MS-179C  (all builds)
Memory8.8 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180315
Uptime0.4 Days
Run DateOct 06 '18 at 18:32
Run Duration124 Seconds
Run User FRA-User
Background CPU6%

 PC Performing above expectations (65th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
73.9% Very good
Memory 83.1
1-Core 100
2-Core 201
73% 128 Pts
4-Core 349
8-Core 584
57% 467 Pts
64-Core 565
35% 565 Pts
Poor: 38%
This bench: 73.9%
Great: 73%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070 (Mobile)
MSI(1462 11DE) ≥ 4GB
Driver: nvldumdx.dll Ver. 25.21.14.1616
Performing below potential (78th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
76.1% Very good
Lighting 92.1
Reflection 113
Parallax 87.9
75% 97.8 fps
MRender 98.7
Gravity 93.2
Splatting 95.1
78% 95.7 fps
Poor: 48%
This bench: 76.1%
Great: 82%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung MZNLN256HMHQ-00000 256GB
57GB free (System drive)
Firmware: MAV2100Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 368 308 276 296 312 314 MB/s
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
109% Outstanding
Read 451
Write 406
Mixed 376
SusWrite 312
87% 386 MB/s
4K Read 41
4K Write 95.5
4K Mixed 54.2
182% 63.6 MB/s
DQ Read 368
DQ Write 326
DQ Mixed 335
254% 343 MB/s
Poor: 68%
This bench: 109%
Great: 116%
WD Blue 2.5" 1TB (2004)-$46
66GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 70 73 73 73 73 73 MB/s
Performing below expectations (27th percentile)
36.5% Below average
Read 54.5
Write 52.5
Mixed 37.2
SusWrite 72.5
40% 54.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.6
117% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 36.5%
Great: 62%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston MSI24D4S7S8MB-8 9905624-033.A00G 16GB
2400, 2400 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing below potential (39th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
72.3% Very good
MC Read 28
MC Write 28.9
MC Mixed 21.4
75% 26.1 GB/s
SC Read 14.8
SC Write 24
SC Mixed 21.3
57% 20 GB/s
Latency 74.9
53% 74.9 ns
Poor: 57%
This bench: 72.3%
Great: 80%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical MS-179C Builds (Compare 499 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 46%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 70%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 38%
Jet ski

Motherboard: MSI MS-179C

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $245Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback