Supermicro SYS-6028U-TRT+

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (13th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 87 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 38.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory384GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 384GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemSupermicro SYS-6028U-TRT+  (all builds)
MotherboardSupermicro X10DRU-i+
Memory121.4 GB free of 384 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1024 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20160809
Uptime40 Days
Run DateOct 06 '18 at 16:33
Run Duration173 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU10%

 PC Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
1st CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2620 v4
CPU1, 2 CPU, 16 cores, 32 threads
Base clock 2.1 GHz, turbo 1.65 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
38.1% Below average
Memory 30.5
1-Core 55.5
2-Core 122
37% 69.5 Pts
4-Core 244
8-Core 490
43% 367 Pts
64-Core 1,423
88% 1,423 Pts
Poor: 52%
This bench: 38.1%
Great: 72%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Synology iSCSI Storage 21TB
3.5TB free
Firmware: 4.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 266 216 43 109 94 85 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
35.9% Below average
Read 211
Write 357
Mixed 250
SusWrite 136
54% 238 MB/s
4K Read 12.3
4K Write 17
4K Mixed 14.7
46% 14.7 MB/s
DQ Read 96.5
DQ Write 109
DQ Mixed 155
102% 120 MB/s
Synology iSCSI Storage 110TB
51.5TB free
Firmware: 4.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 93 95 94 94 94 94 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
23.6% Poor
Read 90.4
Write 86.2
Mixed 85.8
SusWrite 94
20% 89.1 MB/s
4K Read 10.1
4K Write 10.5
4K Mixed 9.4
33% 10 MB/s
DQ Read 89.4
DQ Write 93.6
DQ Mixed 119
82% 101 MB/s
Intel Raid 5 Volume 11.5TB
7TB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1.0.
SusWrite @10s intervals: 9.1 9.6 9.7 9.5 9.1 9.9 MB/s
Performing below expectations (30th percentile)
91.6% Outstanding
Read 309
Write 20.2
Mixed 34
SusWrite 9.5
68% 93.1 MB/s
4K Read 5.3
4K Write 1.1
4K Mixed 1
352% 2.47 MB/s
Poor: 4%
This bench: 91.6%
Great: 247%
Avago SMC3108 42TB
11.5TB free
Firmware: 4.65
SusWrite @10s intervals: 6.4 6.2 6.3 6.7 5.8 7.8 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M393A4K40BB1-CRC 12x31.9GB
12 of 24 slots used
383GB DIMM DDR4 2400 MHz clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing below potential (5th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
58.7% Above average
MC Read 34.3
MC Write 16.8
MC Mixed 19.2
67% 23.4 GB/s
SC Read 8.2
SC Write 10.4
SC Mixed 11
28% 9.87 GB/s
Latency 252
16% 252 ns
Poor: 59%
This bench: 58.7%
Great: 167%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback