Asrock 970 Pro3 R2.0

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 34%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 67%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 27%
Raft
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (42nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 58 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 59.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics53.1% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive43.4% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardAsrock 970 Pro3 R2.0  (all builds)
Memory28.2 GB free of 32 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20160531
Uptime0 Days
Run DateOct 06 '18 at 11:58
Run Duration1004 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU4%

 PC Performing as expected (42nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD FX-8320E-$87
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.3 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (71st percentile)
59.8% Above average
Memory 83
1-Core 60.4
2-Core 125
56% 89.4 Pts
4-Core 200
8-Core 306
31% 253 Pts
64-Core 336
21% 336 Pts
Poor: 47%
This bench: 59.8%
Great: 65%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 970-$200
CLim: 1455 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 416.16
Performing below potential (92nd percentile) - Disable monitor sync before benchmarking (67 fps cap detected)
53.1% Above average
Lighting 67.4
Reflection 68.2
Parallax 66.6
55% 67.4 fps
MRender 67.6
Gravity 62.5
Splatting 54
50% 61.4 fps
Poor: 43%
This bench: 53.1%
Great: 54%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston SSDNow V+200 240GB-$193
147GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 502ABBF0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 0 0 0 2.5 121 99 MB/s
Performing below potential (1st percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
43.4% Average
Read 122
Write 194
Mixed 163
SusWrite 37.1
29% 129 MB/s
4K Read 23.1
4K Write 42.9
4K Mixed 26.9
92% 31 MB/s
DQ Read 183
DQ Write 160
DQ Mixed 151
119% 165 MB/s
Poor: 53%
This bench: 43.4%
Great: 91%
Samsung 840 250GB-$251
223GB free
Firmware: DXT08B0Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 0 0 0 0.1 236 242 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (16th percentile)
55.5% Above average
Read 427
Write 241
Mixed 152
SusWrite 79.6
50% 225 MB/s
4K Read 24.8
4K Write 42.1
4K Mixed 19.8
85% 28.9 MB/s
DQ Read 240
DQ Write 113
DQ Mixed 25.2
59% 126 MB/s
Poor: 51%
This bench: 55.5%
Great: 85%
Hitachi HDS5C3020ALA632 2TB-$270
1TB free
Firmware: ML6OA580
SusWrite @10s intervals: 0 0 0 0.5 103 106 MB/s
Performing below expectations (35th percentile)
48.7% Average
Read 135
Write 133
Mixed 73
SusWrite 34.9
69% 93.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.7
129% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 48.7%
Great: 73%
TOSHIBA USB 3.5"-HDD 1.5TB
602GB free, PID 0b09
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 0 0 38 39 40 39 MB/s
Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)
16.6% Very poor
Read 38.3
Write 38.5
Mixed 28.3
SusWrite 26.1
44% 32.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 1
94% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 16.6%
Great: 19%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston HyperX DDR3 2400 C11 4x8GB
4 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR3 1600 MHz clocked @ 800 MHz
Performing below potential (9th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
45.7% Average
MC Read 18.6
MC Write 14.8
MC Mixed 16.4
47% 16.6 GB/s
SC Read 8.1
SC Write 8
SC Mixed 11.2
26% 9.1 GB/s
Latency 75.1
53% 75.1 ns
Poor: 44%
This bench: 45.7%
Great: 109%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 970 Pro3 R2.0 Builds (Compare 787 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 21%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 65%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 17%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Asrock 970 Pro3 R2.0 - $18

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 88% - Excellent Total price: $152
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $163Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $31Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $37SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $79G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback