Asus TUF GAMING FX504GD_FX80GD

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (49th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 51 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 74.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Boot Drive107% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
CPU throttled at 99% by Windows. Ensure maximum processor state is set to 100% via Settings > System > Power & sleep > Additional power settings > Change plan settings > Change advanced power settings > Processor power management > Maximum processor state.
Run History
5 years ago, 5 years ago.
SystemAsus TUF GAMING FX504GD_FX80GD  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK FX504GD
Memory13.2 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920x1080x4294967296 szín
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180412
Uptime0 Days
Run DateOct 05 '18 at 17:24
Run Duration137 Seconds
Run User HUN-User
Background CPU6%
CPU Throttled 99%

 PC Performing as expected (49th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-8750H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 2.2 GHz, turbo 2.5 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (58th percentile)
74.6% Very good
Memory 94.2
1-Core 118
2-Core 196
80% 136 Pts
4-Core 298
8-Core 566
51% 432 Pts
64-Core 577
36% 577 Pts
Poor: 42%
This bench: 74.6%
Great: 86%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston A1000 NVMe PCIe M.2 240GB-$53
120GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 11.L Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 519 511 508 502 439 225 MB/s
Performing as expected (47th percentile)
107% Outstanding
Read 504
Write 742
Mixed 311
SusWrite 450
113% 502 MB/s
4K Read 23.6
4K Write 62.6
4K Mixed 34.5
113% 40.2 MB/s
DQ Read 459
DQ Write 604
DQ Mixed 591
430% 551 MB/s
Poor: 71%
This bench: 107%
Great: 141%
Microsoft Storage Space Device 537GB
491GB free
Firmware: 0.1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 49 48 52 51 51 49 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 22% Great: 108%
Microsoft Storage Space Device 461GB
103GB free
Firmware: 0.1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 49 48 52 51 51 49 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
38.4% Below average
Read 83.3
Write 76.8
Mixed 53.8
SusWrite 49.9
49% 66 MB/s
4K Read 1.6
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 1.1
213% 1.33 MB/s
Poor: 28%
This bench: 38.4%
Great: 76%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron 8ATF1G64HZ-2G6H1 Hynix HMA81GS6CJR8N-VK 16GB
2667, 2667 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
80.5% Excellent
MC Read 30.5
MC Write 30.4
MC Mixed 22.8
80% 27.9 GB/s
SC Read 18.6
SC Write 35.9
SC Mixed 24.8
76% 26.4 GB/s
Latency 59.2
68% 59.2 ns
Poor: 54%
This bench: 80.5%
Great: 84%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical TUF GAMING FX504GD_FX80GD Builds (Compare 2,639 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 63%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

System: Asus TUF GAMING FX504GD_FX80GD

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. Because UserBenchmark’s data often contradicts their marketing spiel, they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of money on flagship hardware sales: 4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc. We help consumers get comparable real-world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Additionally, brands spend more on marketing weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated the last 13 years to providing comprehensive and accurate data to our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again and collectively save millions every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback