Asus TUF Z270 MARK 2

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 63%
Destroyer
Desktop
Desktop 89%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 55%
Gunboat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (76th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 24 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 82%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics76.3% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive105% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (31%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
5 years ago, 5 years ago.
MotherboardAsus TUF Z270 MARK 2  (all builds)
Memory5.6 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.5 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit cores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20170723
Uptime1.5 Days
Run DateOct 05 '18 at 04:26
Run Duration146 Seconds
Run User PRT-User
Background CPU 31%
Watch Gameplay: 1070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (76th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-7700-$167
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
82% Excellent
Memory 93.6
1-Core 131
2-Core 251
89% 158 Pts
4-Core 380
8-Core 677
64% 528 Pts
64-Core 715
44% 715 Pts
Poor: 63%
This bench: 82%
Great: 84%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070-$132
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 416.16
Performing below potential (27th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
76.3% Very good
Lighting 93
Reflection 106
Parallax 90.1
76% 96.4 fps
MRender 95.8
Gravity 90.8
Splatting 95.7
77% 94.1 fps
Poor: 71%
This bench: 76.3%
Great: 88%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Blue 250GB-$90
53GB free (System drive)
Firmware: X41110WD
SusWrite @10s intervals: 319 198 195 112 112 80 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
105% Outstanding
Read 502
Write 471
Mixed 339
SusWrite 170
83% 370 MB/s
4K Read 41.1
4K Write 118
4K Mixed 53.2
193% 70.7 MB/s
DQ Read 359
DQ Write 299
DQ Mixed 255
211% 304 MB/s
Poor: 59%
This bench: 105%
Great: 100%
TOSHIBA External USB 3.0 1TB
370GB free, PID a200
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 94 94 95 95 95 95 MB/s
Performing above expectations (61st percentile)
34.7% Below average
Read 62.5
Write 56.2
Mixed 29
SusWrite 94.5
83% 60.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.4
70% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 34.7%
Great: 44%
Kingston DataTraveler 100 G3 USB 3.0 64GB-$12
32GB free, PID 1666
Operating at USB 3.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 76 73 76 73 43 76 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
30.7% Below average
Read 67.8
Write 6.2
Mixed 28
SusWrite 69.5
53% 42.9 MB/s
4K Read 8.8
4K Write 1.2
4K Mixed 2
142% 4 MB/s
Poor: 6%
This bench: 30.7%
Great: 30%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M378A1K43CB2-CRC 1x8GB
1 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2460 MHz
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
43% Average
MC Read 16.1
MC Write 14.7
MC Mixed 11
40% 13.9 GB/s
SC Read 13
SC Write 14.7
SC Mixed 13.9
40% 13.9 GB/s
Latency 60.7
66% 60.7 ns
Poor: 28%
This bench: 43%
Great: 46%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical TUF Z270 MARK 2 Builds (Compare 1,906 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 71%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 90%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 61%
Destroyer

Motherboard: Asus TUF Z270 MARK 2 - $129

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 97% - Outstanding Total price: $629
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $269Nvidia RTX 4060 $295Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback