Intel S2600CP

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 47%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 75%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 51%
Yacht
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way above expectations (87th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 13 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 71.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics61.2% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive55% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardIntel S2600CP  (all builds)
Memory29.4 GB free of 32 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit cores, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit cores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20170324
Uptime0 Days
Run DateOct 05 '18 at 02:19
Run Duration113 Seconds
Run User BRA-User
Background CPU0%
Watch Gameplay: 1060-6GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
1st CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2670 0
CPU 1, 2 CPU, 16 cores, 32 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 2.75 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
71.7% Very good
Memory 80.7
1-Core 87.3
2-Core 175
66% 114 Pts
4-Core 337
8-Core 634
58% 485 Pts
64-Core 1,617
100% 1,617 Pts
Poor: 52%
This bench: 71.7%
Great: 71%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB-$117
CLim: 2012 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 416.16
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
61.2% Good
Lighting 76.2
Reflection 78.6
Parallax 67.2
62% 74 fps
MRender 71
Gravity 72
Splatting 74.7
60% 72.5 fps
Poor: 51%
This bench: 61.2%
Great: 60%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Intel MegaSR 478GB
421GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 57 89 158 185 182 206 MB/s
Performing above expectations (67th percentile)
55% Above average
Read 566
Write 249
Mixed 265
SusWrite 146
68% 306 MB/s
4K Read 17.9
4K Write 27
4K Mixed 15.7
62% 20.2 MB/s
DQ Read 148
DQ Write 65.4
DQ Mixed 5.5
31% 73 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 55%
Great: 81%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 9965516-003.A00LF 9965516-001.B00LF 9965516-001.B00LF 9965516-001.B00LF 32GB
1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz
8192, 8192, 8192, 8192 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
56.1% Above average
MC Read 36.2
MC Write 13.8
MC Mixed 15.7
63% 21.9 GB/s
SC Read 9.4
SC Write 4.1
SC Mixed 5.3
18% 6.27 GB/s
Latency 79.2
50% 79.2 ns
Poor: 43%
This bench: 56.1%
Great: 56%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical S2600CP Builds (Compare 38 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 69%
Battle cruiser
Desktop
Desktop 70%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 91%
Nuclear submarine

Motherboard: Intel S2600CP

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 124% - Outstanding Total price: $195
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $156Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $361Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback