Gigabyte GA-890GPA-UD3H

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 50%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (47th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 53 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 58.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics0.82% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive42% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (13%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
5 years ago, 5 years ago.
MotherboardGigabyte GA-890GPA-UD3H  (all builds)
Memory5.9 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1280 x 1024 - 32 Bit renk
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20101124
Uptime0 Days
Run DateOct 04 '18 at 12:45
Run Duration128 Seconds
Run User TUR-User
Background CPU 13%

 PC Performing as expected (47th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Phenom II X4 955-$83
Socket M2, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.2 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
58.2% Above average
Memory 84.2
1-Core 47.1
2-Core 95.5
50% 75.6 Pts
4-Core 188
8-Core 191
25% 190 Pts
64-Core 191
12% 191 Pts
Poor: 38%
This bench: 58.2%
Great: 60%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
ATI Radeon HD 4290
Gigabyte(1458 D000) 640MB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 8.970.100.9001
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
0.82% Terrible
Lighting 0.9
Reflection 1.81
Parallax 0.5
1% 1.07 fps
MRender 1.33
Gravity 0.37
Splatting 1.74
1% 1.15 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 0.82%
Great: 1%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Green 120GB (2018)-$59
96GB free (System drive)
Firmware: UE360000
SusWrite @10s intervals: 69 70 79 71 77 74 MB/s
Performing as expected (45th percentile)
42% Average
Read 403
Write 128
Mixed 159
SusWrite 73.4
42% 191 MB/s
4K Read 16.4
4K Write 29.4
4K Mixed 14.2
59% 20 MB/s
DQ Read 117
DQ Write 45.7
DQ Mixed 41.9
41% 68.2 MB/s
Poor: 32%
This bench: 42%
Great: 53%
OCZ ATV 8GB
3GB free, PID bc06
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 7.2 8.4 8.6 8.3 8.3 8.4 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (19th percentile)
7.1% Terrible
Read 24.9
Write 6.8
Mixed 5.5
SusWrite 8.2
12% 11.4 MB/s
4K Read 7.2
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
27% 2.4 MB/s
Poor: 7%
This bench: 7.1%
Great: 10%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 1x8GB
1 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM
Performing below potential (31st percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
26.7% Poor
MC Read 10.2
MC Write 7.3
MC Mixed 8
24% 8.5 GB/s
SC Read 7.5
SC Write 6.6
SC Mixed 7.7
21% 7.27 GB/s
Latency 73.1
55% 73.1 ns
Poor: 18%
This bench: 26.7%
Great: 67%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-890GPA-UD3H Builds (Compare 166 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 48%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-890GPA-UD3H

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 56% - Above average Total price: $203
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback