Asus Rampage II Extreme

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 69%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (63rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 37 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 84.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics4.69% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
MotherboardAsus Rampage II Extreme  (all builds)
Memory6.2 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20100921
Uptime0 Days
Run DateOct 04 '18 at 07:39
Run Duration138 Seconds
Run User RUS-User
Background CPU5%

 PC Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon X5690
LGA1366, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.45 GHz
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
84.4% Excellent
Memory 95.6
1-Core 102
2-Core 203
78% 133 Pts
4-Core 395
8-Core 614
62% 505 Pts
64-Core 749
46% 749 Pts
Poor: 64%
This bench: 84.4%
Great: 85%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
ATI Radeon HD 4710
Device(17AF 3000) 1GB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 8.970.100.1100
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
4.69% Terrible
Lighting 5.63
Reflection 8.31
Parallax 3.78
5% 5.91 fps
MRender 5.71
Gravity 4.07
Splatting 7.48
5% 5.75 fps
Poor: 5%
This bench: 4.69%
Great: 5%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston SSDNow V300 120GB-$36
3GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 608ABBF0
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 192
Write 148
Mixed 158
37% 166 MB/s
4K Read 24.7
4K Write 51
4K Mixed 28.2
101% 34.6 MB/s
DQ Read 33.4
DQ Write 97.7
DQ Mixed 32
34% 54.4 MB/s
Poor: 30% Great: 73%
Seagate ST3120026AS 120GB-$24
39GB free
Firmware: .360
SusWrite @10s intervals: 31 30 29 28 30 29 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (16th percentile)
18% Very poor
Read 33
Write 35
Mixed 26.8
SusWrite 29.4
23% 31.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 0.5
4K Mixed 0.6
101% 0.57 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 18%
Great: 31%
Seagate BUP Slim 1TB
874GB free, PID ab26
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 94 97 97 97 97 97 MB/s
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
44.1% Average
Read 108
Write 68.5
Mixed 54.5
SusWrite 96.3
106% 81.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 2.4
4K Mixed 0.9
114% 1.3 MB/s
Poor: 19%
This bench: 44.1%
Great: 46%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 16GB
null MHz
4096, 4096, 8192 MB
Performing above expectations (65th percentile)
42.3% Average
MC Read 16.7
MC Write 13.7
MC Mixed 12.3
41% 14.2 GB/s
SC Read 11.1
SC Write 7.9
SC Mixed 11.2
29% 10.1 GB/s
Latency 55.2
72% 55.2 ns
Poor: 25%
This bench: 42.3%
Great: 54%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Rampage II Extreme Builds (Compare 531 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 37%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 70%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 29%
Raft

Motherboard: Asus Rampage II Extreme

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 77% - Very good Total price: $301
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback