Asus TUF B450-PLUS GAMING

Performance Results


Gaming 21% Surfboard	Desktop 45% Speed boat	Workstation 21% Surfboard


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (15th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 85 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 28.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics	53.7% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	24.9% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (79%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago.

Motherboard	Asus TUF B450-PLUS GAMING (all builds)
Memory	11.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20180608
Uptime	0.2 Days
Run Date	Oct 04 '18 at 03:02
Run Duration	130 Seconds
Run User	CHL-User
Background CPU	79%

PC Performing way below expectations (15^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 5 2600X-$175 142,983 User benchmarks, average bench 74% AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg) Relative performance (0^th percentile)	28.6% Poor	Memory 28.3 1-Core 63.8 2-Core 100 35% 64.1 Pts	4-Core 155 8-Core 285 26% 220 Pts	64-Core 443 27% 443 Pts
Poor: 64% ↑ This bench: 28.6% Great: 86%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GTX 1060 6GB 56,417 User benchmarks, average bench 56% Gigabyte(1458 371A) ≥ 4GB CLim: 1961 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 411.70 Performing below potential (29^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	53.7% Above average	Lighting 67 Reflection 70.8 Parallax 62.4 55% 66.7 fps	MRender 67.2 Gravity 57 Splatting 65.7 52% 63.3 fps
Poor: 51% ↑ This bench: 53.7% Great: 62%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Kingston A400 240GB-$28 424,288 User benchmarks, average bench 66% 173GB free (System drive) Firmware: SBFK61E1 SusWrite @10s intervals: 150 124 77 75 75 73 MB/s Performing below potential (1^st percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	24.9% Poor	Read 122 Write 85 Mixed 87 SusWrite 95.5 22% 97.2 MB/s	4K Read 7.5 4K Write 15 4K Mixed 9.1 31% 10.5 MB/s	DQ Read 86 DQ Write 122 DQ Mixed 137 94% 115 MB/s
Poor: 33% ↑ This bench: 24.9% Great: 100%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$28 3,105,054 User benchmarks, average bench 83% 931GB free Firmware: 02.01A02 SusWrite @10s intervals: 115 120 125 117 120 118 MB/s Performing below expectations (24^th percentile)	71.4% Very good	Read 130 Write 102 Mixed 65 SusWrite 119 76% 104 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 2 4K Mixed 0.8 155% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 52% ↑ This bench: 71.4% Great: 109%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston HyperX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB 51,435 User benchmarks, average bench 86% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 2400 MHz clocked @ 1200 MHz Performing way below expectations (7^th percentile)	67.3% Good	MC Read 28.8 MC Write 24.3 MC Mixed 27 76% 26.7 GB/s	SC Read 10.5 SC Write 13.7 SC Mixed 13.7 36% 12.6 GB/s	Latency 265 15% 265 ns
Poor: 65% ↑ This bench: 67.3% Great: 108%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical TUF B450-PLUS GAMING Builds (Compare 5,430 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 78%

Battleship

Desktop 87%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 73%

Battleship

Motherboard: Asus TUF B450-PLUS GAMING

CPU
Ryzen 5 3600AMD $85Bench 83%, 1,072,639 samples	1,400x
Ryzen 5 2600AMD $145Bench 73%, 179,588 samples	812x
Ryzen 7 2700XAMD $190Bench 76%, 159,077 samples	471x

GPU
RTX 2060Nvidia $273Bench 90%, 645,160 samples	427x
RX 580AMD $130Bench 52%, 360,351 samples	295x
GTX 1660S (Super)Nvidia $195Bench 71%, 428,800 samples	295x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	153x
A400 480GBKingston $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples	130x
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $76Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	126x

RAM
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $40Bench 85%, 653,654 samples	390x
HyperX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBKingstonBench 86%, 239,203 samples	241x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GBCorsair $45Bench 82%, 606,405 samples	208x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 91% - Outstanding

Total price: $426

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260	Nvidia RTX 4070 $549	Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16