HP EliteBook Folio 9480m

Performance Results


Gaming 6% Tree trunk	Desktop 60% Destroyer	Workstation 5% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (74th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 26 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 59.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics	3.44% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	89.9% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

Run History

7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago.

System	HP EliteBook Folio 9480m (all builds)
Motherboard	Hewlett-Packard 22DA
Memory	3.3 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs
OS	Windows 7
BIOS Date	20140703
Uptime	6.4 Days
Run Date	May 17 '16 at 18:26
Run Duration	300 Seconds
Run User	CAN-User
Background CPU	10%

PC Performing above expectations (74^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-4600U 26,548 User benchmarks, average bench 49% U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2.7 GHz Performing way above expectations (90^th percentile)	59.8% Above average	Memory 81.6 1-Core 90.7 2-Core 163 66% 112 Pts	4-Core 221 8-Core 226 30% 223 Pts	64-Core 227 14% 227 Pts
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 59.8% Great: 62%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel HD 4400 (Mobile 1.0/1.1 GHz) 275,372 User benchmarks, average bench 2% HP(103C 22DA) 2GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 10.18.10.3574 Performing way above expectations (86^th percentile)	3.44% Terrible	Lighting 4.2 Reflection 4.27 Parallax 5.47 3% 4.65 fps	MRender 4 Gravity 2.23 Splatting 5.87 4% 4.03 fps
Poor: 2% ↑ This bench: 3.44% Great: 3%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Mtfddak2 MTFDDAK256MAY-1A 256GB 72 User benchmarks, average bench 85% 128GB free (System drive) Firmware: M5T4 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing as expected (59^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 3 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 3735 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 100 8 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 256 (AA) Unknown 100 100 16 (AB) Unknown 100 100 0 (AC) Unknown 100 100 0 (AD) Unknown 100 100 19 (AE) Unknown 100 100 8 (B5) Unknown 100 100 4170426680061 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (B8) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BC) Unknown 100 100 248 (BE) vendor-specific 63 54 197569544229 (C2) HDA temperature 63 54 197569544229 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 100 100 3288276013 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 16 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0	89.9% Excellent	Read 480 Write 324 Mixed 375 87% 393 MB/s	4K Read 24.2 4K Write 101 4K Mixed 31.3 130% 52.3 MB/s	DQ Read 237 DQ Write 274 DQ Mixed 44.2 92% 185 MB/s
Poor: 51% ↑ This bench: 89.9% Great: 106%
Seagate FreeAgent GoFlex 1.5TB 771 User benchmarks, average bench 22% 1.5TB free, PID 5031 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed Performing way above expectations (93^rd percentile)	32.3% Below average	Read 82.3 Write 82.2 Mixed 53 91% 72.5 MB/s	4K Read 0.54 4K Write 0.76 4K Mixed 0.16 34% 0.49 MB/s
Poor: 9% ↑ This bench: 32.3% Great: 33%
Kingston DT Mini Fun G2 4GB 81 User benchmarks, average bench 5% 3GB free, PID 6545 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed Performing as expected (53^rd percentile)	4.95% Terrible	Read 18.6 Write 4.24 Mixed 5.25 9% 9.35 MB/s	4K Read 5.55 4K Write 0.006 4K Mixed 0.003 21% 1.85 MB/s
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 4.95% Great: 7%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M471B1G73DB0-YK0 1x8GB 44,908 User benchmarks, average bench 28% 1 of 2 slots used 8GB SODIMM DDR3 1600 MHz Performing above expectations (65^th percentile)	29.9% Poor	MC Read 10.4 MC Write 9.9 MC Mixed 8.2 27% 9.5 GB/s	SC Read 9.5 SC Write 10.3 SC Mixed 9.6 28% 9.8 GB/s	Latency 77.6 52% 77.6 ns
Poor: 17% ↑ This bench: 29.9% Great: 33%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical EliteBook Folio 9480m Builds (Compare 76 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 2%

Tree trunk

Desktop 49%

Yacht

Workstation 2%

Tree trunk

System: HP EliteBook Folio 9480m

CPU
Core i5-4310UIntelBench 49%, 14,648 samples	39x
Core i7-4600UIntelBench 49%, 26,548 samples	30x
Core i5-4210UIntelBench 41%, 82,966 samples	5x

GPU
HD 4400 (Mobile 1.0/1.1 GHz)IntelBench 2%, 275,372 samples	74x
HD 5000 (Mobile 1.0/1.1 GHz)IntelBench 3%, 6,906 samples	2x

SSD
SSD Pro 1500 Series 180GBIntel $209Bench 69%, 7,834 samples	5x
MZ7PD256HCGM-000H7 256GBSamsungBench 84%, 5,922 samples	4x
MZ7PD128HCFV-000H1 128GBSamsungBench 83%, 3,024 samples	3x

RAM
M471B5173DB0-YK0 1x4GBSamsungBench 24%, 51,191 samples	6x
M471B1G73DB0-YK0 1x8GBSamsungBench 28%, 44,908 samples	5x
M471B1G73QH0-YK0 1x8GBSamsungBench 28%, 40,451 samples	3x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 4% - Terrible

Total price: $209

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $163	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $31	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $37	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16