Asus M5A99FX PRO R2.0

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 76%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 77%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 62%
Destroyer
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (65th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 35 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 75.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics100% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive82.7% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (16%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardAsus M5A99FX PRO R2.0  (all builds)
Memory13.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20140407
Uptime0 Days
Run DateOct 03 '18 at 08:26
Run Duration172 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 16%

 PC Performing above expectations (65th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD FX-8350-$130
Socket 942, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4.6 GHz, turbo 4.55 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
75.5% Very good
Memory 93.7
1-Core 69
2-Core 159
65% 107 Pts
4-Core 310
8-Core 498
50% 404 Pts
64-Core 499
31% 499 Pts
Poor: 48%
This bench: 75.5%
Great: 68%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070-Ti-$299
CLim: 1987 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 411.70
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
100% Outstanding
Lighting 128
Reflection 135
Parallax 128
105% 131 fps
MRender 97.5
Gravity 130
Splatting 108
92% 112 fps
Poor: 86%
This bench: 100%
Great: 101%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Evo 500GB-$76
302GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RVT01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 176 184 190 193 190 189 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
82.7% Excellent
Read 368
Write 322
Mixed 329
SusWrite 187
68% 302 MB/s
4K Read 34.9
4K Write 68.5
4K Mixed 45.4
147% 49.6 MB/s
DQ Read 264
DQ Write 203
DQ Mixed 227
172% 231 MB/s
Poor: 74%
This bench: 82.7%
Great: 129%
Kingston SSDNow V300 60GB-$76
33GB free
Firmware: 580ABBF0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 77 75 76 74 72 65 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
65.4% Good
Read 400
Write 75.2
Mixed 127
SusWrite 73
37% 169 MB/s
4K Read 31.5
4K Write 76.3
4K Mixed 34.9
133% 47.6 MB/s
DQ Read 111
DQ Write 78
DQ Mixed 91.3
69% 93.5 MB/s
Poor: 27%
This bench: 65.4%
Great: 69%
WD Black 6TB (2016)-$222
4.5TB free
Firmware: 81.H0A81
SusWrite @10s intervals: 146 149 147 144 149 150 MB/s
Performing as expected (41st percentile)
96% Outstanding
Read 186
Write 193
Mixed 77.7
SusWrite 148
110% 151 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 6.1
4K Mixed 0.9
255% 2.67 MB/s
Poor: 64%
This bench: 96%
Great: 121%
Samsung Flash Drive 32GB
29GB free, PID 1000
Operating at USB 3.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 28 26 24 26 24 25 MB/s
Performing above expectations (85th percentile)
76.1% Very good
Read 212
Write 36.5
Mixed 82.1
SusWrite 25.6
93% 89.1 MB/s
4K Read 13.5
4K Write 11.9
4K Mixed 10.8
822% 12.1 MB/s
DQ Read 17.9
DQ Write 21
DQ Mixed 12.7
1,213% 17.2 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 76.1%
Great: 86%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
HyperX Fury DDR3 1866 C10 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 1600 MHz clocked @ 800 MHz
Performing below potential (29th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
53.4% Above average
MC Read 22.9
MC Write 15.9
MC Mixed 18.8
55% 19.2 GB/s
SC Read 12.1
SC Write 8.5
SC Mixed 12.4
31% 11 GB/s
Latency 60.6
66% 60.6 ns
Poor: 36%
This bench: 53.4%
Great: 72%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical M5A99FX PRO R2.0 Builds (Compare 1,067 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 34%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 69%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 28%
Raft

Motherboard: Asus M5A99FX PRO R2.0 - $200

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 58% - Above average Total price: $606
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay more to market weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they return repeatedly.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback