Gigabyte GA-970A-UD3P

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 18%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 65%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 16%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (38th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 62 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 57.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics25.4% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive77.7% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (45%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
5 years ago, 5 years ago.
MotherboardGigabyte GA-970A-UD3P  (all builds)
Memory12.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 0.7 GHz
Display1280 x 1024 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20130806
Uptime1 Days
Run DateOct 01 '18 at 23:23
Run Duration230 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 45%

 PC Performing below expectations (38th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD FX-8350-$130
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 4.05 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (23rd percentile)
57.8% Above average
Memory 73.7
1-Core 66.7
2-Core 125
54% 88.4 Pts
4-Core 227
8-Core 427
39% 327 Pts
64-Core 431
27% 431 Pts
Poor: 48%
This bench: 57.8%
Great: 68%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 760-$209
Asus(1043 847A) 2GB
CLim: 1228 MHz, MLim: 1502 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 390.65
Performing below potential (40th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
25.4% Poor
Lighting 29.5
Reflection 26.9
Parallax 39.2
24% 31.9 fps
MRender 38.1
Gravity 35.9
Splatting 30.6
28% 34.9 fps
Poor: 24%
This bench: 25.4%
Great: 28%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Pro 128GB-$65
43GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EXM01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 277 278 277 279 266 228 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
77.7% Very good
Read 404
Write 340
Mixed 240
SusWrite 268
70% 313 MB/s
4K Read 24.8
4K Write 58.1
4K Mixed 31.8
109% 38.2 MB/s
DQ Read 274
DQ Write 236
DQ Mixed 237
182% 249 MB/s
Poor: 71%
This bench: 77.7%
Great: 119%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$29
556GB free
Firmware: 15.01H15
SusWrite @10s intervals: 69 134 128 136 135 132 MB/s
Performing as expected (45th percentile)
81.6% Excellent
Read 162
Write 149
Mixed 73.7
SusWrite 122
93% 127 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2.4
4K Mixed 1.1
200% 1.43 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 81.6%
Great: 109%
WD My Passport 0820 1TB
330GB free, PID 0820
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 73 73 75 76 75 69 MB/s
Performing as expected (56th percentile)
32.9% Below average
Read 73.5
Write 70.5
Mixed 45.5
SusWrite 73.5
88% 65.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 1
104% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 32.9%
Great: 44%
Leef Fuse 32GB
12GB free, PID 1000
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 5.5 7.5 7.6 7.7 7.9 7.5 MB/s
Performing below expectations (21st percentile)
4.69% Terrible
Read 16.5
Write 1.7
Mixed 7.7
SusWrite 7.3
9% 8.3 MB/s
4K Read 3
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
11% 1 MB/s
Poor: 5%
This bench: 4.69%
Great: 7%
USB Flash DISK 32GB
23GB free, PID 1000
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete
Read 15.7
Mixed 0.2
5% 7.95 MB/s
4K Read 4.5
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
17% 1.5 MB/s
Poor: 4% Great: 27%
Kingston DataTraveler 2.0 16GB
15GB free, PID 6545
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 7.8 4.1 4.1 3.6 4.1 4 MB/s
Performing above expectations (71st percentile)
5.19% Terrible
Read 21.2
Write 17.5
Mixed 9.4
SusWrite 4.6
16% 13.2 MB/s
4K Read 4.7
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
17% 1.57 MB/s
Poor: 3%
This bench: 5.19%
Great: 6%
WDC WD10 EZEX-08M2NA0 1TB
622GB free, PID 2336
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 26 25 27 27 27 26 MB/s
Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)
17% Very poor
Read 27
Write 26.5
Mixed 24.7
SusWrite 26.4
36% 26.1 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 2.3
4K Mixed 1.2
123% 1.53 MB/s
Poor: 17%
This bench: 17%
Great: 23%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston HyperX DDR3 1600 C10 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 667 MHz clocked @ 800 MHz
Performing below expectations (39th percentile)
43.2% Average
MC Read 18.4
MC Write 14.1
MC Mixed 16.2
46% 16.2 GB/s
SC Read 6.2
SC Write 6.8
SC Mixed 8.8
21% 7.27 GB/s
Latency 93.1
43% 93.1 ns
Poor: 27%
This bench: 43.2%
Great: 53%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-970A-UD3P Builds (Compare 825 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 20%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 65%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 16%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-970A-UD3P - $300

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 60% - Good Total price: $549
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $245Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback