MSI Z270 GAMING M3 (MS-7A62)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 49%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 97%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 44%
Speed boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (69th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 31 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 94.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics45.8% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive88.9% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemMSI MS-7A62
MotherboardMSI Z270 GAMING M3 (MS-7A62)  (all builds)
Memory11.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180124
Uptime4.9 Days
Run DateOct 01 '18 at 20:58
Run Duration186 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU3%

 PC Performing above expectations (69th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-7700K-$235
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4.2 GHz, turbo 4.6 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
94.9% Outstanding
Memory 94
1-Core 147
2-Core 292
98% 178 Pts
4-Core 515
8-Core 815
82% 665 Pts
64-Core 820
51% 820 Pts
Poor: 71%
This bench: 94.9%
Great: 92%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX Titan-$1,088
EVGA(3842 2790) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1202 MHz, MLim: 1502 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 399.7
Performing below potential (48th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
45.8% Average
Lighting 56.5
Reflection 55.1
Parallax 70.3
46% 60.6 fps
MRender 63.5
Gravity 59.2
Splatting 47
45% 56.5 fps
Poor: 43%
This bench: 45.8%
Great: 50%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
OCZ Vertex 3 MAX IOPS 240GB-$160
58GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2.22
SusWrite @10s intervals: 182 158 160 157 156 151 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
88.9% Excellent
Read 393
Write 249
Mixed 288
SusWrite 161
61% 273 MB/s
4K Read 33.8
4K Write 111
4K Mixed 45.1
168% 63.4 MB/s
DQ Read 303
DQ Write 224
DQ Mixed 260
195% 262 MB/s
Poor: 55%
This bench: 88.9%
Great: 91%
WD Black 1TB (2010)-$60
173GB free
Firmware: 05.01D05
SusWrite @10s intervals: 86 87 87 88 88 87 MB/s
Performing as expected (43rd percentile)
54.3% Above average
Read 101
Write 99
Mixed 89.5
SusWrite 87.4
70% 94.3 MB/s
4K Read 1.3
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 0.8
184% 1.43 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 54.3%
Great: 76%
WDC WD20 EZRX-00D8PB0 2TB
367GB free, PID 0551
SusWrite @10s intervals: 0 0.1 0 0 0.1 59 MB/s
Performing as expected (56th percentile)
24.8% Poor
Read 100
Write 97
Mixed 57.7
SusWrite 9.8
83% 66.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 2.6
4K Mixed 1
126% 1.5 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 24.8%
Great: 56%
WDC WD50 00AACS-61M6B2 500GB
263GB free, PID 0551
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 0.4 0.2 0.1 0 0.1 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
19.2% Very poor
Read 82.7
Write 82.5
Mixed 63.8
SusWrite 0.1
73% 57.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2.3
4K Mixed 0.6
101% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 19%
This bench: 19.2%
Great: 19%
ST350063 0AS 500GB
354GB free, PID 0551
SusWrite @10s intervals: 70 72 68 72 69 71 MB/s
Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
31.4% Below average
Read 69.2
Write 48.3
Mixed 49
SusWrite 70.4
79% 59.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.5
84% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 18%
This bench: 31.4%
Great: 31%
ST350083 0AS 500GB
36GB free, PID 0551
SusWrite @10s intervals: 9.6 9.7 8.6 9.1 8.6 9 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
15.8% Very poor
Read 66.3
Write 32.5
Mixed 46.5
SusWrite 9.1
46% 38.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.9
77% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 16%
This bench: 15.8%
Great: 26%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Crucial BLS8G4D240FSB.16FBD 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing above expectations (65th percentile)
83.1% Excellent
MC Read 29.8
MC Write 31.9
MC Mixed 25.5
83% 29.1 GB/s
SC Read 19.5
SC Write 33.7
SC Mixed 26
75% 26.4 GB/s
Latency 59.8
67% 59.8 ns
Poor: 47%
This bench: 83.1%
Great: 88%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Z270 GAMING M3 (MS-7A62) Builds (Compare 2,210 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 89%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 90%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 76%
Battleship

Motherboard: MSI Z270 GAMING M3 (MS-7A62) - $300

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 92% - Outstanding Total price: $878
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback