Asus P8H67-M LX

Performance Results


Gaming 62% Destroyer	Desktop 81% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 47% Yacht


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (42nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 58 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 77%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	79.1% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	48.6% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago.

Motherboard	Asus P8H67-M LX (all builds)
Memory	6 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20110331
Uptime	0.8 Days
Run Date	Sep 30 '18 at 23:53
Run Duration	145 Seconds
Run User	CAN-User
Background CPU	6%

Watch Gameplay: 1070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing as expected (42^nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-2500K-$246 143,007 User benchmarks, average bench 66% LGA1155, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (92^nd percentile)	77% Very good	Memory 92.5 1-Core 92.8 2-Core 183 73% 123 Pts	4-Core 358 8-Core 355 48% 356 Pts	64-Core 355 22% 355 Pts
Poor: 44% ↑ This bench: 77% Great: 79%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070-$132 1,459,281 User benchmarks, average bench 80% EVGA(3842 5173) CLim: 1999 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 399.7 Performing below potential (50^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	79.1% Very good	Lighting 99.5 Reflection 110 Parallax 92.4 81% 101 fps	MRender 91.7 Gravity 86.5 Splatting 95.3 75% 91.2 fps
Poor: 71% ↑ This bench: 79.1% Great: 88%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 840 Evo 250GB-$95 217,115 User benchmarks, average bench 96% 17GB free (System drive) Firmware: EXT0BB0Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 132 87 18 27 17 28 MB/s Performing below potential (1^st percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	48.6% Average	Read 223 Write 211 Mixed 195 SusWrite 51.6 38% 170 MB/s	4K Read 29.2 4K Write 41.3 4K Mixed 32.7 108% 34.4 MB/s	DQ Read 39.1 DQ Write 84.5 DQ Mixed 47.9 40% 57.2 MB/s
Poor: 64% ↑ This bench: 48.6% Great: 118%
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$90 695,664 User benchmarks, average bench 112% 81GB free Firmware: EMT02B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 135 88 22 32 18 28 MB/s Performing way below expectations (1^st percentile)	60.6% Good	Read 381 Write 359 Mixed 304 SusWrite 54 61% 274 MB/s	4K Read 30.8 4K Write 54.2 4K Mixed 37.8 124% 40.9 MB/s	DQ Read 40.8 DQ Write 107 DQ Mixed 55.4 48% 67.7 MB/s
Poor: 80% ↑ This bench: 60.6% Great: 134%
WD Black 1TB (2010)-$49 257,835 User benchmarks, average bench 57% 74GB free Firmware: 05.01D05 SusWrite @10s intervals: 94 95 95 93 95 96 MB/s Performing way below expectations (18^th percentile)	45.9% Average	Read 65.2 Write 62 Mixed 63.8 SusWrite 94.4 53% 71.3 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 2.4 4K Mixed 0.8 167% 1.33 MB/s
Poor: 35% ↑ This bench: 45.9% Great: 76%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Corsair CMZ8GX3M2A1600C9 8GB 520 User benchmarks, average bench 43% 1333, 1333 MHz 4096, 4096 MB Performing way above expectations (92^nd percentile)	52.3% Above average	MC Read 18 MC Write 18.9 MC Mixed 16.5 51% 17.8 GB/s	SC Read 14.3 SC Write 16.8 SC Mixed 15.8 45% 15.6 GB/s	Latency 63.1 63% 63.1 ns
Poor: 26% ↑ This bench: 52.3% Great: 53%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical P8H67-M LX Builds (Compare 184 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 5%

Tree trunk

Desktop 56%

Gunboat

Workstation 5%

Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus P8H67-M LX

CPU
Core i5-2400Intel $250Bench 61%, 166,255 samples	34x
Core i5-2500IntelBench 63%, 82,538 samples	22x
Core i3-2100Intel $49Bench 51%, 63,701 samples	22x

GPU
HD 2000 (Desktop 1.1 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 150,891 samples	27x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	15x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	8x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	5x
WDS480G2G0B-00EPW0 480GBWDCBench 46%, 14,337 samples	5x
A400 120GBKingston $29Bench 61%, 166,392 samples	5x

RAM
1x8GBUnknownBench 38%, 168,538 samples	8x
99P5471-012.A00LF 8GBKingstonBench 49%, 18 samples	6x
9905471-006.A01LF 12GBKingstonBench 40%, 25 samples	4x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 58% - Above average

Total price: $278

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $163	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $37	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16