TEST
YOUR PC
ADD TO PC
BUILD

Asus N53SM

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 60%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk
Save results Copy results User guide
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (78th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 22 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 66%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics1.89% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive68.8% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (15%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemAsus N53SM  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK N53SM
Memory5 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20120110
Uptime0 Days
Run DateSep 30 '18 at 17:52
Run Duration127 Seconds
Run User LTU-User
Background CPU 15%

 PC Performing above expectations (78th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-2670QM-$200
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.2 GHz, turbo 2.75 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
66% Good
Memory 85.8
1-Core 78.2
2-Core 148
63% 104 Pts
4-Core 252
8-Core 357
38% 305 Pts
64-Core 356
22% 356 Pts
Poor: 31% ↑
This bench: 66%
 Great: 67%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 3000 (Mobile V1 1.1/1.2 GHz)
Asus(1043 2114) 2GB
Driver: Ver. 9.17.10.4459
Performing above expectations (69th percentile)
1.89% Terrible
Lighting 2.07
Reflection 4.58
Parallax 1.41
2% 2.68 fps
MRender 3
Gravity 1.13
Splatting 3.87
2% 2.67 fps
Poor: 1% ↑
This bench: 1.89%
 Great: 2%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston A400 240GB-$28
168GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFKB1E1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 279 213 216 209 213 212 MB/s
Performing as expected (56th percentile)
68.8% Good
Read 378
Write 343
Mixed 309
SusWrite 224
70% 314 MB/s
4K Read 20.2
4K Write 45.1
4K Mixed 26
88% 30.4 MB/s
DQ Read 268
DQ Write 303
DQ Mixed 198
173% 256 MB/s
Poor: 33% ↑
This bench: 68.8%
 Great: 100%
StoreJet Transcend 1TB
311GB free, PID null
SusWrite @10s intervals: 86 93 93 94 94 94 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
43.9% Average
Read 72.4
Write 81.2
Mixed 38.8
SusWrite 92.2
97% 71.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 4.3
4K Mixed 0.3
158% 1.7 MB/s
Poor: 10% ↑
This bench: 43.9%
 Great: 46%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown CT51264BC1339.M16F Hynix HMT351S6CFR8C-H9 8GB
1333, 1333 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
48.9% Average
MC Read 17.5
MC Write 17.9
MC Mixed 15.6
49% 17 GB/s
SC Read 13
SC Write 14.2
SC Mixed 13.4
39% 13.5 GB/s
Latency 71.4
56% 71.4 ns
Poor: 26% ↑
This bench: 48.9%
 Great: 49%
Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU GPU SSD HDD RAM MBD
Typical N53SM Builds (Compare 118 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 51%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 3%
Tree trunk

System: Asus N53SM

CPU
Core i7-2670QMIntel  $200Bench 56%, 51,169 samples94x
Core i5-2450MIntel  $225Bench 49%, 51,836 samples20x
Core i5-2520MIntel  $34Bench 48%, 45,308 samples2x
GPU
HD 3000 (Mobile V1 1.1/1.2 GHz)IntelBench 2%, 209,058 samples61x
GeForce GT 630MNvidiaBench 3%, 7,774 samples44x
HD 3000 (Mobile V2 1.3 GHz)IntelBench 2%, 110,588 samples13x
SSD
SP800 64GBAdataBench 40%, 122 samples6x
A400 240GBKingston  $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples5x
870 EVO 500GBSamsung  $68Bench 104%, 60,851 samples4x
RAM
HMT325S6CFR8C-H9 HMT351S6CFR8C-H9 6GBHynixBench 38%, 426 samples26x
HMT351S6CFR8C-H9 2x4GBHynixBench 43%, 6,386 samples14x
HMT351S6CFR8C-H9 HMT325S6CFR8C-H9 6GBHynixBench 40%, 239 samples6x
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 62% - Good Total price: $200
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. Because UserBenchmark’s data often contradicts their marketing spiel, they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of money on flagship hardware sales: 4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc. We help consumers get comparable real-world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Additionally, brands spend more on marketing weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated the last 13 years to providing comprehensive and accurate data to our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again and collectively save millions every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest
Amazon Ebay
deals
Build Test EFps
Can You Run It?
►
YouTube
*NEW*
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback