Asus M5A99X EVO R2.0

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 21%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 74%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 18%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (70th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 30 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 67.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics24.4% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive61.7% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (22%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsus M5A99X EVO R2.0  (all builds)
Memory5.1 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.9 GHz
Display1680 x 1050 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20140403
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateSep 30 '18 at 12:59
Run Duration177 Seconds
Run User ARG-User
Background CPU 22%

 PC Performing above expectations (70th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD FX-8350-$130
Socket 942, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 4.05 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
67.6% Good
Memory 92
1-Core 70
2-Core 138
62% 100 Pts
4-Core 236
8-Core 430
40% 333 Pts
64-Core 434
27% 434 Pts
Poor: 48%
This bench: 67.6%
Great: 68%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD R7 370-$153
CLim: 985 MHz, MLim: 1400 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 18.5.1
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
24.4% Poor
Lighting 29.8
Reflection 31.7
Parallax 38.3
24% 33.3 fps
MRender 28.2
Gravity 23.7
Splatting 35.7
24% 29.2 fps
Poor: 19%
This bench: 24.4%
Great: 23%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston SSDNow V300 240GB-$35
125GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 60AABBF0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 157 142 144 135 142 140 MB/s
Performing as expected (41st percentile)
61.7% Good
Read 357
Write 214
Mixed 218
SusWrite 143
52% 233 MB/s
4K Read 23.6
4K Write 58
4K Mixed 26.6
101% 36.1 MB/s
DQ Read 141
DQ Write 211
DQ Mixed 161
126% 171 MB/s
Poor: 41%
This bench: 61.7%
Great: 85%
Kingston SSDNow V300 240GB-$35
111GB free
Firmware: 60AABBF0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 180 146 159 166 174 161 MB/s
Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)
72% Very good
Read 333
Write 242
Mixed 267
SusWrite 164
56% 252 MB/s
4K Read 26.5
4K Write 67.2
4K Mixed 37.2
123% 43.6 MB/s
DQ Read 215
DQ Write 239
DQ Mixed 191
154% 215 MB/s
Poor: 41%
This bench: 72%
Great: 85%
Seagate ST320LT022-1AE142 320GB
12GB free
Firmware: 0001EXM1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 35 34 44 44 43 44 MB/s
Performing below expectations (22nd percentile)
27.1% Poor
Read 53.7
Write 44.3
Mixed 41.4
SusWrite 40.8
33% 45 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 0.6
4K Mixed 0.6
99% 0.57 MB/s
Poor: 16%
This bench: 27.1%
Great: 48%
WD Blue 500GB (2010)-$20
28GB free
Firmware: 15.01H15
SusWrite @10s intervals: 117 117 118 119 118 119 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
68.7% Good
Read 121
Write 116
Mixed 67.6
SusWrite 118
77% 106 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 1
176% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 24%
This bench: 68.7%
Great: 69%
Seagate ST320LT022-1AE142 320GB
184GB free
Firmware: 0001EXM1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 79 78 79 79 80 79 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
45.4% Average
Read 79.5
Write 58
Mixed 43.8
SusWrite 78.9
48% 65.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 0.7
4K Mixed 0.6
100% 0.6 MB/s
Poor: 16%
This bench: 45.4%
Great: 48%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
HyperX Fury DDR3 1866 C10 2x4GB-$35
2 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR3 1866 MHz clocked @ 933 MHz
Performing as expected (42nd percentile)
48.6% Average
MC Read 20.5
MC Write 14.9
MC Mixed 16.2
49% 17.2 GB/s
SC Read 11.1
SC Write 9.4
SC Mixed 12.1
31% 10.9 GB/s
Latency 64.2
62% 64.2 ns
Poor: 30%
This bench: 48.6%
Great: 67%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical M5A99X EVO R2.0 Builds (Compare 754 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 34%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 69%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 28%
Raft

Motherboard: Asus M5A99X EVO R2.0 - $300

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 53% - Above average Total price: $729
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $175Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback