Gigabyte GA-Z270X-Gaming K5

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 47%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 99%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 42%
Speed boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (38th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 62 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 91.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics45.3% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive190% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (13%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardGigabyte GA-Z270X-Gaming K5  (all builds)
Memory28.2 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20171130
Uptime0 Days
Run DateSep 28 '18 at 21:53
Run Duration221 Seconds
Run User HRV-User
Background CPU 13%

 PC Performing below expectations (38th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-7700K-$230
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4.2 GHz, turbo 4.8 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
91.7% Outstanding
Memory 92.1
1-Core 153
2-Core 303
100% 183 Pts
4-Core 491
8-Core 831
80% 661 Pts
64-Core 827
51% 827 Pts
Poor: 71%
This bench: 91.7%
Great: 92%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 970-$200
Gigabyte(1458 3679) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1418 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 411.63
Performing below potential (18th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
45.3% Average
Lighting 54.3
Reflection 65.3
Parallax 56.2
44% 58.6 fps
MRender 70.5
Gravity 53.6
Splatting 52.6
47% 58.9 fps
Poor: 43%
This bench: 45.3%
Great: 54%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 250GB-$45
146GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 3B7QCXE7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 612 312 315 312 311 305 MB/s
Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)
190% Outstanding
Read 1518
Write 1,297
Mixed 492
SusWrite 361
203% 917 MB/s
4K Read 35.4
4K Write 151
4K Mixed 48.8
196% 78.5 MB/s
DQ Read 1,044
DQ Write 1,117
DQ Mixed 907
730% 1,023 MB/s
Poor: 142%
This bench: 190%
Great: 236%
SanDisk SSD Plus 240GB-$28
102GB free
Firmware: U21010RL
SusWrite @10s intervals: 385 396 386 390 386 387 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
83.7% Excellent
Read 405
Write 370
Mixed 256
SusWrite 388
80% 355 MB/s
4K Read 24.9
4K Write 108
4K Mixed 15.6
115% 49.5 MB/s
DQ Read 185
DQ Write 302
DQ Mixed 108
120% 198 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 83.7%
Great: 86%
Kingston SSDNow V300 120GB-$38
112GB free
Firmware: 521ABBF0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 81 69 80 80 78 79 MB/s
Performing below expectations (31st percentile)
46.9% Average
Read 141
Write 94.3
Mixed 105
SusWrite 77.8
23% 105 MB/s
4K Read 19.2
4K Write 91.5
4K Mixed 22.4
106% 44.4 MB/s
DQ Read 116
DQ Write 93.8
DQ Mixed 92.4
73% 101 MB/s
Poor: 30%
This bench: 46.9%
Great: 73%
Toshiba P300 3TB-$100
1.5TB free
Firmware: MX6OACF0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 132 134 133 133 137 140 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
70% Good
Read 109
Write 118
Mixed 36.7
SusWrite 135
72% 99.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 0.5
126% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 56%
This bench: 70%
Great: 108%
Toshiba P300 3TB-$100
2.5TB free
Firmware: MX6OACF0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 146 146 146 148 146 154 MB/s
Performing below expectations (36th percentile)
81.5% Excellent
Read 136
Write 143
Mixed 43.7
SusWrite 148
85% 118 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.6
134% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 56%
This bench: 81.5%
Great: 108%
Toshiba DT01ACA300 3TB-$80
152GB free
Firmware: MX6OABB0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 83 84 83 85 90 85 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
56.9% Above average
Read 113
Write 116
Mixed 32
SusWrite 84.9
63% 86.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.6
124% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 51%
This bench: 56.9%
Great: 107%
Toshiba DT01ACA300 3TB-$80
2TB free
Firmware: MX6OABB0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 146 147 152 144 149 150 MB/s
Performing below expectations (36th percentile)
79.3% Very good
Read 128
Write 158
Mixed 24.8
SusWrite 148
83% 115 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.8
160% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 51%
This bench: 79.3%
Great: 107%
WD Elements 1078 1.5TB
1TB free, PID 1078
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 37 38 38 37 38 38 MB/s
Performing below expectations (28th percentile)
18.7% Very poor
Read 38
Write 34
Mixed 25.2
SusWrite 37.6
45% 33.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.7
80% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 18.7%
Great: 42%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair CMU16GX4M2C3200C16 4x8GB
4 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing below potential (19th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
73.1% Very good
MC Read 26
MC Write 28.1
MC Mixed 22.7
73% 25.6 GB/s
SC Read 17.2
SC Write 29.2
SC Mixed 21.4
64% 22.6 GB/s
Latency 63.9
63% 63.9 ns
Poor: 67%
This bench: 73.1%
Great: 117%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-Z270X-Gaming K5 Builds (Compare 1,102 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 89%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 90%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 76%
Battleship

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-Z270X-Gaming K5

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 86% - Excellent Total price: $615
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $269Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback